By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - This is EA thinking we are stupids!

 

Are we that stupids?

yes 89 64.03%
 
i don't know, it seems true 50 35.97%
 
Total:139
Euphoria14 said:
o_O.Q said:
zorg1000 said:
o_O.Q said:
LilChicken22 said:

Next time bring some sources please, because you made that up about CryEngine 3 ( http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/06/20/crytek-cryengine-3-beautiful-on-wii-u ). UE4 is a scalable engine so that even phones can run them. Like I already said; EA isn't even trying to get us believe them a LITTLE bit. They don't deserve respect in any form until they simply convince not wanting to develop for Wii U because of the missing audience who prefers original games over the same generic shooter over and over again. Blaming the Wii U power as an excuse is just disgusting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Thats kinda a dumb comparison, I admit they have milked 2D Mario by releasing 3DS and Wii U versions ao closely but the first NSMB was the first 2D Mario in 15 years and the Wii version the first console 2D Mario in 18 years. On the other hand we've had I beleive 9 CODs in as many years.


nah whats dumb is bringing up CoD when it was never mentioned in the first place

and hang on there weren't 2d mario games released between the one for wii and super mario world?

With GBA I think they only recycled the old Mario Bros. games.

ok



Around the Network
Euphoria14 said:
the_dengle said:
o_O.Q said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

EA, on the other hand--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-OD-FniMjo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6p3_fg87y4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzotjsJ41Ks

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJk9wzl6rf0

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpzg8V9qGc

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWnmEqIewwg

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3BzTx05aHo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psXov-E0_XA

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDGW_BWJgO4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMtgAF3zWWE

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry8_3-_MaSk

What did you expect EA to do? Change the way Football is played?

Since the game requires so little effort, they could just, y'know, not charge $60 for it. There's no reason most EA Sports games can't just be a $10 patch of last year's game. "Oh, I see you bought Madden '10 last year. Would you like to update to Madden '11 for $9.99?"



o_O.Q said:
the_dengle said:
o_O.Q said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

 


weren't there other 2d mario games in between?

how about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv1Ry6-pdOQ

20 years later again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiFFI-rfHVQ

 

i'm just making the point that lilchicken's comment is very ironicc

If you think the original DKC games are the same as DKC Returns then you never played those games. 



Nintendo and PC gamer

Euphoria14 said:
the_dengle said:
Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

EA, on the other hand--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-OD-FniMjo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6p3_fg87y4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzotjsJ41Ks

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJk9wzl6rf0

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpzg8V9qGc

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWnmEqIewwg

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3BzTx05aHo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psXov-E0_XA

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDGW_BWJgO4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMtgAF3zWWE

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry8_3-_MaSk

What did you expect EA to do? Change the way Football is played?

Could have added some brooms here and there and make it more like quidditch.



osed125 said:
o_O.Q said:
the_dengle said:
o_O.Q said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

 


weren't there other 2d mario games in between?

how about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv1Ry6-pdOQ

20 years later again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiFFI-rfHVQ

 

i'm just making the point that lilchicken's comment is very ironicc

If you think the original DKC games are the same as DKC Returns then you never played those games. 

i haven't played the new ones but the point is that that can also be said of comments like lilchickens that state that all shooters are the same ( yet no one says anything to him )

what changed btw?



Around the Network
o_O.Q said:
the_dengle said:
o_O.Q said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

 


weren't there other 2d mario games in between?

how about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv1Ry6-pdOQ

20 years later again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiFFI-rfHVQ

 

i'm just making the point that lilchicken's comment is very ironicc

I have a question for you:

Do you realize how your blatant cherry picking reflects on your reputation for being able to bring up a valid point in other discussions?

I don't spend too much time on this site, so I have not run into you here before. Now though I have created a little cache in my vgchartz mind where I have stored your avatar, funy username and the comment "does not seem capable of rational debate". Perhaps this is unfair of me, but that's the way it goes. The next time (God forbid) I see something you post on this site, my immidiate thought will be "this guy doesn't think through his points very well" and you'll have a much harder time convincing me that I should take what you have to say seriously.

Now, you might very well say: I don't give a %$##@! what some pompus dickhead on vgchartz thinks, but I am going by the assumption that the majority of people on this site are able to see the lack of coherent reason behind your posts here and will make similar notes in their minds. Perhaps this is your intent, perhaps not. Thus my question.



pezus said:
Moonhero said:
EA hasn't had a worthwhile game on a Nintendo in a long time. Them not being part of Wii U don't hurt its chances of being great.

Mass Effect 3? Need for Speed: MW (arguably the best console version...)?

Mass Effect 3 was for sure the epitome of support.

OT: This is news... when? How? Where?



Bong Lover said:
o_O.Q said:
the_dengle said:
o_O.Q said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

 


weren't there other 2d mario games in between?

how about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv1Ry6-pdOQ

20 years later again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiFFI-rfHVQ

 

i'm just making the point that lilchicken's comment is very ironicc

I have a question for you:

Do you realize how your blatant cherry picking reflects on your reputation for being able to bring up a valid point in other discussions?

I don't spend too much time on this site, so I have not run into you here before. Now though I have created a little cache in my vgchartz mind where I have stored your avatar, funy username and the comment "does not seem capable of rational debate". Perhaps this is unfair of me, but that's the way it goes. The next time (God forbid) I see something you post on this site, my immidiate thought will be "this guy doesn't think through his points very well" and you'll have a much harder time convincing me that I should take what you have to say seriously.

Now, you might very well say: I don't give a %$##@! what some pompus dickhead on vgchartz thinks, but I am going by the assumption that the majority of people on this site are able to see the lack of coherent reason behind your posts here and will make similar notes in their minds. Perhaps this is your intent, perhaps not. Thus my question.


lol well i must say sir your impression of me troubles me very deeply...

i shall now hang my head in shame and report immediately to a psychiatrist

 

ironically though its amusing that you had nothing relevant to add to the point i was making lol

if you ask me you should follow your own advice... or are you more of a do as i say not what i do guy? 



I hope your thread title is somehow a play on the subject or ironic statement, otherwise this is likely the funniest thing I've seen in here so far this year.



o_O.Q said:
zorg1000 said:
o_O.Q said:
LilChicken22 said:

Next time bring some sources please, because you made that up about CryEngine 3 ( http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/06/20/crytek-cryengine-3-beautiful-on-wii-u ). UE4 is a scalable engine so that even phones can run them. Like I already said; EA isn't even trying to get us believe them a LITTLE bit. They don't deserve respect in any form until they simply convince not wanting to develop for Wii U because of the missing audience who prefers original games over the same generic shooter over and over again. Blaming the Wii U power as an excuse is just disgusting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXvHHwOYTFg

over 20 years later https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAV2zs-DiiI

 

lol ok

Thats kinda a dumb comparison, I admit they have milked 2D Mario by releasing 3DS and Wii U versions ao closely but the first NSMB was the first 2D Mario in 15 years and the Wii version the first console 2D Mario in 18 years. On the other hand we've had I beleive 9 CODs in as many years.


nah whats dumb is bringing up CoD when it was never mentioned in the first place

and hang on there weren't 2d mario games released between the one for wii and super mario world?

Sorry I saw generic shooter and thats thr first thing I thought of but no there were none besides the rereleases on GBA which were all originally released 10-15 years earlier



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.