o_O.Q said:
Bong Lover said:
o_O.Q said:
Bong Lover said:
o_O.Q said:
the_dengle said:
Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.
|
weren't there other 2d mario games in between?
how about this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv1Ry6-pdOQ
20 years later again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiFFI-rfHVQ
i'm just making the point that lilchicken's comment is very ironicc
|
I have a question for you:
Do you realize how your blatant cherry picking reflects on your reputation for being able to bring up a valid point in other discussions?
I don't spend too much time on this site, so I have not run into you here before. Now though I have created a little cache in my vgchartz mind where I have stored your avatar, funy username and the comment "does not seem capable of rational debate". Perhaps this is unfair of me, but that's the way it goes. The next time (God forbid) I see something you post on this site, my immidiate thought will be "this guy doesn't think through his points very well" and you'll have a much harder time convincing me that I should take what you have to say seriously.
Now, you might very well say: I don't give a %$##@! what some pompus dickhead on vgchartz thinks, but I am going by the assumption that the majority of people on this site are able to see the lack of coherent reason behind your posts here and will make similar notes in their minds. Perhaps this is your intent, perhaps not. Thus my question.
|
lol well i must say sir your impression of me troubles me very deeply...
i shall now hang my head in shame and report immediately to a psychiatrist
ironically though its amusing that you had nothing relevant to add to the point i was making lol
if you ask me you should follow your own advice... or are you more of a do as i say not what i do guy?
|
Why would I need to add anything to the point you are trying to make? Didn't I already state that it's apparent to many that it's not a very well thought out or well reasoned proposition? Also, keep in mind that I didn't give you any advice, I asked you a question.
|
because as someone who is trying to advise me to engage in rational debate its expected that when you reply to one of my posts, that you'll have points to add that either contradict or reinforce my point depending on your stance for the topic
or do you consider rational debate to instead of consisting of the above to consist of attacking someone who you disagree with?
lol as i said previously your actions from your very first post are contradicting the very point you tried to make in the same post
lol has that occured to you yet?
|
I didn't advice you to do anything. I asked you a question, the question was if you are aware of your posting pattern and the weakness of the argument or not. The reason why I ask is because I want to know if you are trolling, or just not very adapt at seeing the logical concluisons of statements.
Unless it's not clear, I have not entered into the current debate about platformers vs. sports franchises or whatver the discussion has evolved to by now. There's no point for me to point out why your argument is inconsistent and unreasonable, others have already done a fine job of that anyway if you were wondering what I was refering to.
It seems that you have misunderstood the entire premise of what I was asking, let me condense it down to a level that might be more appropriate:
You trollin', bro?
