By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
green_sky on 07 May 2013
Edit Thread
Euphoria14 said:
the_dengle said:
Good point, you're right. Nintendo waited over 20 years before making a true successor to Super Mario World, and when they did, the game was fresh and original, with great level design and new gameplay elements.

EA, on the other hand--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-OD-FniMjo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6p3_fg87y4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzotjsJ41Ks

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJk9wzl6rf0

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpzg8V9qGc

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWnmEqIewwg

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3BzTx05aHo

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psXov-E0_XA

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDGW_BWJgO4

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMtgAF3zWWE

the next year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry8_3-_MaSk

What did you expect EA to do? Change the way Football is played?

Could have added some brooms here and there and make it more like quidditch.