Galvanizer said: Nem said: You're just gonna get disappointed unless they heavily change the game. Well, I've watched 5 hours of walkthrough on YouTube and I think it looks like a better JRPG than FFXIII and FFXIII-2 combined. It has like 10 HD towns and loads of optional areas that can explore in any order. You can also have like 20 party members during battle. Epic! The story may be garbage, but that's not what I play JRPGs for.

i can assure you its not like that when u finally get to spend some time with it, its a title that could have been great and deserves a second look either with a sequel or an update to the first

Galvanizer said: Nem said: You're just gonna get disappointed unless they heavily change the game. Well, I've watched 5 hours of walkthrough on YouTube and I think it looks like a better JRPG than FFXIII and FFXIII-2 combined. It has like 10 HD towns and loads of optional areas that can explore in any order. You can also have like 20 party members during battle. Epic! The story may be garbage, but that's not what I play JRPGs for.

Beeing better than FFXIII is not dificult. The battles are a bit random in how they work, the towns have loads screens all over the place, the story i dont know cause i got way too bored to keep going.

JRPG's are totally about the story though. Thats why they tend to be linear.

Seriously, you're not missing anything. You have a PC, i think the game is out for PC aswell. Get that version and you'll see. You will waste less money aswell.

Soriku said: I'm pretty sure the PC version is considered good. But no, this isn't very interesting. It's already 2013. Most likely they just couldn't be bothered to remove it. I think they should release it if they could get it to perform better than the 360 version though.

Actually, they've been actively moving it back a year since 2008. They've been doing the exact same thing for FF Versus XIII. Both were once under the 2009 section, then the 2010, then 2011, then 2012, and now the 2013 section. Also, it's only these two games that have a TBA release date next to them.

The fact that TLR and FF Versus XIII both have TBA next to them could mean that TLR will soon come out, just like FF Versus XIII. Either that, or it could mean that FF Versus XIII is also canned and those Kotaku rumors were more legit than people originally thought.

It wasn't a very good game either, there is no reason to get your hopes up. You're just wasting your time.

It's definitely one of the better JRPGs this gen, but I honestly don't think it's coming out. If so I hope they work out the slowdown and texture bugs. You have a little less control, but it's a lot funner then hitting X in every fight and sleeping like most games today.

Galvanizer said: gergroy said: ps3 owners don't want the game, it is completely broken... I want it. I heard it was open ended and that it has loads of side-quests and HD towns. Also, the PS3 version may have more content or even be a remake like what they're doing for FFXIV.

side-quests and hd towns?  Those are the two features you are excited about?  The game is garbage, combat is broken, story is meh, technical bugs everywhere.  No, it isn't a good game.  If you want a good JRPG get Lost Odyssey, Last Story, or Xenoblade Chronicles.  Those are the three best JRPG's of the gen.

Nem said: Galvanizer said: Nem said: You're just gonna get disappointed unless they heavily change the game. Well, I've watched 5 hours of walkthrough on YouTube and I think it looks like a better JRPG than FFXIII and FFXIII-2 combined. It has like 10 HD towns and loads of optional areas that can explore in any order. You can also have like 20 party members during battle. Epic! The story may be garbage, but that's not what I play JRPGs for. Beeing better than FFXIII is not dificult. The battles are a bit random in how they work, the towns have loads screens all over the place, the story i dont know cause i got way too bored to keep going. JRPG's are totally about the story though. Thats why they tend to be linear. Seriously, you're not missing anything. You have a PC, i think the game is out for PC aswell. Get that version and you'll see. You will waste less money aswell.

Funny enough, I actually don't play JRPGs for the story. I play them for the sense of adventure and exploration and the battle systems and character customization systems. That's why I love FFXII so much despite some people hating it because they didn't like the story. Heck, my avatar is the most hated male character in 3D Final Fantasy.

Anyway, I'm a huge fan of Monster Hunter and that has absolutely zero story. Actually, I think Super Mario Bros. on the NES has more story than Monster Hunter. LOL! I think I will enjoy The Last Remnant as long as it has a vast world to explore, a deep battle system and loads of customization option and items to collect.

I would like to try t on PC but I found out it's Steam exclusive. I hate Steam. As a result, it's PS3 or bust.

Galvanizer said: Nem said: Galvanizer said: Nem said: You're just gonna get disappointed unless they heavily change the game. Well, I've watched 5 hours of walkthrough on YouTube and I think it looks like a better JRPG than FFXIII and FFXIII-2 combined. It has like 10 HD towns and loads of optional areas that can explore in any order. You can also have like 20 party members during battle. Epic! The story may be garbage, but that's not what I play JRPGs for. Beeing better than FFXIII is not dificult. The battles are a bit random in how they work, the towns have loads screens all over the place, the story i dont know cause i got way too bored to keep going. JRPG's are totally about the story though. Thats why they tend to be linear. Seriously, you're not missing anything. You have a PC, i think the game is out for PC aswell. Get that version and you'll see. You will waste less money aswell. Funny enough, I actually don't play JRPGs for the story. I play them for the sense of adventure and exploration and the battle systems and character customization systems. That's why I love FFXII so much despite some people hating it because they didn't like the story. Heck, my avatar is the most hated male character in 3D Final Fantasy. Anyway, I'm a huge fan of Monster Hunter and that has absolutely zero story. Actually, I think Super Mario Bros. on the NES has more story than Monster Hunter. LOL! I think I will enjoy The Last Remnant as long as it has a vast world to explore, a deep battle system and loads of customization option and items to collect. I would like to try t on PC but I found out it's Steam exclusive. I hate Steam. As a result, it's PS3 or bust.

sounds like you should be playing skyrim

gergroy said: Galvanizer said: gergroy said: ps3 owners don't want the game, it is completely broken... I want it. I heard it was open ended and that it has loads of side-quests and HD towns. Also, the PS3 version may have more content or even be a remake like what they're doing for FFXIV. side-quests and hd towns?  Those are the two features you are excited about?  The game is garbage, combat is broken, story is meh, technical bugs everywhere.  No, it isn't a good game.  If you want a good JRPG get Lost Odyssey, Last Story, or Xenoblade Chronicles.  Those are the three best JRPG's of the gen.

I own Lost Odyssey and have completed it twice. It's an amazing game. It's a bit linear for my tastes, though. The Last Story was good, but it was more linear than Lost Odyssey.

Xenoblade is the best JRPG I have played since FFXII. Best JRPG this gen, no doubt.

Also, I can look past technical bugs if the gameplay is fun and appeals to me. I've been watching bootleg DVDs for years. You know the ones recorded off a cinema screen and the cam is not steady and people sometimes walk past the screen? Yep, those ones. LOL! I've got desensitized to poor visual quality now. It don't affect me if the film or game is good to watch or fun to play. However, I do hope a PS3 version has all the technical issues removed.

Galvanizer said: gergroy said: Galvanizer said: gergroy said: ps3 owners don't want the game, it is completely broken... I want it. I heard it was open ended and that it has loads of side-quests and HD towns. Also, the PS3 version may have more content or even be a remake like what they're doing for FFXIV. side-quests and hd towns?  Those are the two features you are excited about?  The game is garbage, combat is broken, story is meh, technical bugs everywhere.  No, it isn't a good game.  If you want a good JRPG get Lost Odyssey, Last Story, or Xenoblade Chronicles.  Those are the three best JRPG's of the gen. I own Lost Odyssey and have completed it twice. It's an amazing game. It's a bit linear for my tastes, though. The Last Story was good, but it was more linear than Lost Odyssey. Xenoblade is the best JRPG I have played since FFXII. Best JRPG this gen, no doubt. Also, I can look past technical bugs if the gameplay is fun and appeals to me. I've been watching bootleg DVDs for years. You know the ones recorded off a cinema screen and the cam is not steady and people sometimes walk past the screen? Yep, those ones. LOL! I've got desensitized to poor visual quality now. It don't affect me if the film or game is good to watch or fun to play. However, I do hope a PS3 version has all the technical issues removed.

well, the combat is probably the worst part of the game to be honest.  Your combat options are pretty much random, so if one of your groups needs to heal and the option isn't there, tough luck.  Frustrating deaths is pretty common since you have little control of the actual combat.  

Also, the game is more linear than lost odyssey, so again, you should probably be playing skyrim...