''Nothing'' in its physical form...laws have no physical form. I thought we were talking about physial mater only here.

Basically, this whole conversation basically confirmes the theistic abrahamic God or deistic higher power i easly the most logical cause for the existence of the universe. (so far at least)

This is really the crux of the ontological and cosmological argument for God's existence. It all rests on whether or not necessary existence is a meaningful concept, and philosophers debate this problem quite extensively.

By 'nothing', I meant everything, both physical and abstract entities. 

If anything, this conversating shows that 'something' must exist. It's not logically possible for nothing to exist. I don't see how this confirms that a single, conscious, omnibeloved, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent, being started the universe.

Well, you asked about the laws. But laws on their own can not make something happen (most certanly not something as complicated as the universe), they need something to enforce them...and that something cant be nothing. They need some sort of force, guidence, or physical matter. Its simple as that.  So even if if we say something did existe before the universe (and we dont include God) its still highly unlikely that that 'something'' caused the universe to exist

True, but it is laws that stop things from happening in our universe. The laws of our universe prevent things from coming from nothing; everything has a cause. But before the universe existed, that law may or may not have existed. Therefore, before the universe existed, things may or may not have appeared without cause. Theoretically at least. 

Everything you've said is based on the laws and logic of our universe. But before the universe, who is to say that those laws and that logic applied?

the point I'm making is that someone needs to form them in a form of two glasses. this goes to every thing in the universe! nothing can become something without guidance I mean I cant just through a bunch of wood and hope a bookshelf will build its self right?

how I know? well there are prophesies that are coming true yet have been written 1400 years ago. how can I not believe in things predicted to happen in that time frame and in to the future when they are happening everyday?

but this will take a lot of time to explain. I might do that tomorrow if your interested.

well it was not designed to live in that crack but it was designed to grow in dirt so wherever the seed falls and if the circumstances are right then it will grow. so that aria was not for it but because of the dirt it was designed to grow in it managed to do so for a short period. I'm not designed to have parasites on my body but the parasites are designed to jump on any body that they can suck on

how to define a soul... your life, consciousness

You know to whom logic and laws of our universe dont apply to? God. It is really the most logical explanation.

''But before the universe, who is to say that those laws and that logic applied?''

Nothing, but to create OUR UNIVERSE as it is now, you would need to use (or create) the laws that apply to OUR UNIVERSE. We can thus assume, that universe was created using the laws which it contains today. You cant use any laws to create something which later creates its own different laws and rules

True. but why must that God be conscious, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibeloved, and how do you know there aren't more Gods. I can understand a belief in a creator, but where do these other  traits come from?

As for the second part: Who's to say? It seems like you're just making assumptions here. Just because laws have been constant for your life doesn't mean they weren't at some other time. 

1.) Yes, people must create a glass. Yes, some things are created by humans. But there are many more things not created by humans. People do not create planets, water, the sun, etc. so I don't see how this goes to every thing in the universe. Using that one example to explain the universe doesn't work because that one example doesn't make sense for everything else in the universe.

2.) What are these prophesies? Please, tell me.

3.) We're not talking about what the plant was designed to do. We're talking about what the sidewalk was designed to do. The sidewalk was not designed for plants, clearly. Just like the universe was not designed for life. Considering life is just barely hospitable in a very tiny part of the universe and it'll only be hospitable for a very short amount of time.

4.) How does life/consciousness prove God? Just because we cannot explain something today doesn't mean we should just jump and say "God did it!" That just means we don't know currently. There were plenty of things we didn't know in the past. Did that mean God did it? No, it just took us a while to learn more about the universe, ourselves, etc.

"law that "something cannot come from nothing" also doesn't exist. There are no laws governing nothingness that claim "something cannot come from nothing." Because no such laws exist, then something can come from nothing, in theory at least. "

Umm that isn't a law unless your saying the law of logic which exist just like abstract things.
If nothing existed numbers still exist laws are based from reactions in the physical world unlike abstract things.