Player1x3 said:
|
This same argument could be said for the Multiverse/Universe. It always was, as you stated.
Player1x3 said:
|
This same argument could be said for the Multiverse/Universe. It always was, as you stated.
spaceguy said:
M-Theory!!! There is another video that goes over all the theories but I could not find it. I will update if I do.
|
Yeah but the question of them all: what was surrounding the area before the big bang. Was it just empty white space. Even then, what caused the empty white space to be there.


In mathematics the law of limits would apply here. Either you have nothing or an infinite amount of something, in this case energy, since the universe needed energy to come into being it would be the infinite limit. (There is also a negetive infinte limit but it doesn't apply here) And only a finite amount was used to create the universe, there is still a lot of energy (an infinite amount) outside of the universe. (I favor the closed universe theories.)
dsgrue3 said:
This same argument could be said for the Multiverse/Universe. It always was, as you stated. |
Except that we know our Universe isnt eternal nor timeless and actually had a beginning. Universe wasnt always here. And multiverse is just a weakly supported hypothesis. And even if multiverse do exists, how does that disprove the theory that higher power/ God did created (or caused) it?
| Player1x3 said: Except that we know our Universe isnt eternal nor timeless and actually had a beginning. Universe wasnt always here. And multiverse is just a weakly supported hypothesis. And even if multiverse do exists, how does that disprove the theory that higher power/ God did created (or caused) it? |
Player1x3 said:
|
I've had more of an oppotunity to ponder this today and whereas I originally supported a multiverse white hole/black hole connection, it now makes little to no sense to me after having realized that black holes do not consume dark matter.
I now believe there are only 2-verses. Ours and its anti-verse. There is so much duality in life that this is the only logical conclusion I can draw.
Back on your point though, as Jay said, it isn't about disproving a creator. It is about understanding how everything came to be - how nature (or God) created it. The who isn't really a concern of mine, the HOW is. That is what I desire to know.
dsgrue3 said:
Back on your point though, as Jay said, it isn't about disproving a creator. It is about understanding how everything came to be - how nature (or God) created it. The who isn't really a concern of mine, the HOW is. That is what I desire to know. |
I can understand that
dsgrue3 said:
This same argument could be said for the Multiverse/Universe. It always was, as you stated. |
Ah ha! You get it. Most all our theories have to do with someone else before - ether an other Universe(s), bains, threads, strings, other dimensions, etc. or a supernatural being. Althought if the Big Bang created time as we know it, things get really wierd.
Nothing in this Universe is eternal in it’s current state. It just keeps changing into other things. The very atoms that make you up were once part of stars and super nova. They died so you could live (well, they just burn out, I doubt they were thinking of you.)
Either way it has nothing to do with proving or denying a supernatural being, cause that is a choice to believe in or not (faith), it has nothing to do with science.
Turkish said:
|
The membrane's collision was the big bang.
| spaceguy said: The membrane's collision was the big bang. |
Which comes to "What created the membranes?" Which needs some kind of "poof" start two membranes.
