Umm... So sony bribed? Nah jokes. Congrats sony.
Yay!!!
miz1q2w3e said:
I see nothing wrong with what he said, he's talking about bringing those things to gaming/the mainstream gaming audience. 100% correct |
the awards in question aren't secluded to gaming but technology as a whole...
| o_O.Q said: the awards in question aren't secluded to gaming but technology as a whole... |
Maybe you should've been a little more clear.
Then, I was partially wrong. They should still be given the awrd though.
It's about design philosophy, not the innovation of the product. It's a design award.
So much butthurt in this thread.




| theprof00 said: It's about design philosophy, not the innovation of the product. It's a design award. So much butthurt in this thread. |
While I agree with you, I don't think the award has any credibility to begin with. Nintendo fans just stop, this isn't even a big enough deal to say anything negative about.

There's very little to no innovation in the industry, so I don't know why this word gets tossed around a lot.
o_O.Q said:
the awards in question aren't secluded to gaming but technology as a whole... |
Doesn't change the fact that the bolded statements are correct. Besides, I was being rather generous with my statement. The fact is Nintendo showed great innovation with those products, even when looking at the technology industry as a whole. It'd be ridiculous of you to argue otherwise.
miz1q2w3e said:
Doesn't change the fact that the bolded statements are correct. Besides, I was being rather generous with my statement. The fact is Nintendo showed great innovation with those products, even when looking at the technology industry as a whole. It'd be ridiculous of you to argue otherwise. |
to say that in terms of technology that nintendo was the first to market or even popularise clamshell designs, touchscreens or motion control is nonsense... which is what i bolded