you have to be rich to own more than one console?? No you dont, i have 2 current gen ones, and im not close to rich. buy one one year buy another some time else, its not hard.

It is okay with me, because guess what?? I dont just have a Ninty console as long as the games i want to play come to at least one console I own im good, and even if it doesnt, meh, I got my pick of the litter. FYI i long for the day when all 3rd party games are  multiplat for all systems, but i know thats not feasible right now, so whatcha gonna do?? Not buy games?

This is where you and I are different, I have not attachment to any of these companies, I have not stock so there buisness does not affect me in the slightest, at the end of the day my life is unaffected. Cant understand why someone would be attached to a corporation if they have no financial stake in it, but to each his own

from what i've heard developers say in the media, any new piece of hardware adds difficulty.  new libraries to get accustom to, new QA plans to develop and execute.  if they got dev kits late or if their team isn't too big figuring these sorts of things might be just too much work for them in the short term.  i mean really, how many quality titles ever hit a system's launch.  shit takes time and porting isn't free and if the game launches this year the there could be anywhere from 0 to say 3M wiiU's out there.  not exactly a large audience to go after if getting the port up and running cost too much.

was anyone expecting this to come out for WiiU? Maybe I'm missing something here xD

hmmm.... then I'm probably poor. I can barely afford a 3DS with 3 games, have to use my roomie's Wii, don't think I'll be getting a Vita in all honesty. I don't have money to throw left and right. Now you know.

@italics. I appreciate the way you say that, but I'm trying to tell you it's not about me. It doesn't really matter what I do, it isn't the point. How do you not understand oni? It's about what consumers choose, not what I choose, and it's ultimately about what I wish for Nintendo, i.e. success.

3rd paragraph: Do you have a favorite team? A favorite boxer, or fighter? Something you feel attached to or patriotic of? I don't have a favorite hockey team, the closest I get is tennis and I vouch for Federer and Nadal, not either I respect both. In gaming, I respect all the companies, but personally, I vouch for Nintendo. I want them to be the winner in the end, if winner there is to be. With that ambition, I write my posts trying to understand the market. In this mindset, the position of these devs is one that is not only illogical, but revolting for me. There is no reason for them to shun Nintendo's platform, and it is revolting to me because it is 100% against my ambition. To each his own, but at least now you can possibly relate and maybe even understand. If not, sorry that it bothers you. I understand why I do it, and will continue to discuss it from a business perspective, not from a gamer's perspective. I hope it's okay.

That's true for all new hardware, and sooner or later they will have to figure out said hardware if they want to release a game in the future. The system is said to be easy to code (similar APIs to the Xbox) so a port wouldn't be that difficult. Vigil got their game working after an intensive month's work done by three guys. Making a HUDless Tomb Raider that runs as good as the PC version could be an incentive to go that extra mile in their development plans if they saw fit, but it wasn't unique. Fair enough.

"completely new canon" and not being a prequel, that's laughable. So pathetic to spit on your history like that,.

and the critical question is:

will the WiiU get ANY game at all!?

I mean the ''no Wii version'' trend has started again, before the WiiU even launches

So they are going to make a Mac version but not one for Wii U... lol

Really? When? Then I lost all my respect for TR.

This is just to avoid saying that they're not doing it because it's not relevant saleswise.