By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide on 26 January 2012
Edit Thread
happydolphin said:
oniyide said:
Machina said:
pezus said:
happydolphin said:

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!



The idiocy has already begun!!! :( Can't they understand that it's not because a console sports a secondary screen that they have to use it? Did they have to use kinect when making it on the 360? ...... Obviously No.

Why the double standards, this is getting ridiculous for heaven sakes? I want to slap them.

Their reasoning is a bit...sketchy lol


Well yeah, if you take it out of context like padib did in his post and ignore their primary reasoning, which is that the Wii U was announced too late in the development cycle of the game. Perfectly sound reasoning...


Besides, it's up to them what platforms they develop their game for. If they don't want to develop on Wii or Wii U that's up to them - Wii U will get better support than Wii did, but it won't be as comprehensively supported as Sony and MS's platforms, and people are deluding themselves if they think it will. If you want to play all these 3rd party games then you have to buy a console they're actually made for, just as people do for 1st party games. Simple as that.

This, if you dont have another platform to play it on by now, then you were just not that interested in the first place. LOL at the crying

That's not the point buddy. It's not about me... I have the consoles I want, safe those I can't afford. When will you understand not all of us are rich? :S

Anyways, even then, even if I had money, it's not about what I can play. Vgchartz is a site where people talk about the business of video games. In that context, it angers me that developers continue to shun the Nintendo platform and giving lousy excuses. Is that okay with you? You constantly say the same thing, but try to understand for reals this time.

This situation, though ok for most players, is bad for Nintendo and their business, and their business is important to me. You may find this odd, but I have an attachment to the company and wish its success. When news like this comes out, I am very displeased. I hope you can understand that. 


you have to be rich to own more than one console?? No you dont, i have 2 current gen ones, and im not close to rich. buy one one year buy another some time else, its not hard.

It is okay with me, because guess what?? I dont just have a Ninty console as long as the games i want to play come to at least one console I own im good, and even if it doesnt, meh, I got my pick of the litter. FYI i long for the day when all 3rd party games are  multiplat for all systems, but i know thats not feasible right now, so whatcha gonna do?? Not buy games?

This is where you and I are different, I have not attachment to any of these companies, I have not stock so there buisness does not affect me in the slightest, at the end of the day my life is unaffected. Cant understand why someone would be attached to a corporation if they have no financial stake in it, but to each his own