I hope it's available soon, gonna be supply constrained for a while. I am getting the strongest one in the Fx series.
I hope it's available soon, gonna be supply constrained for a while. I am getting the strongest one in the Fx series.
Me!
I'm waiting to see what they actually bring to the table, and once I do, the superior encoding/emulation CPU gets my purchase. So right now it's a heavy fight between the i7 2600k and the FX-8170. I hope for the latter, since I do miss AMD CPU's, I didn't have one since the Athlon 64 x2!
Soleron said:
Link to where it's stated it limits features? Otherwise yeah. |
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Questions-of-Compatibility-AMD-AM3-And-Bulldozer-Discussed/
| Soleron said: I'm not and I am a huge AMD fan. After five years of waiting for a new architecture it comes up short to Intel in every way. |
I've heard the FX-8170 is supposed to be clocked at 4GHz for each core...
@yum123
At least they didn't show Duke Nukem Forever in the demo reel xD
| zarx said: if it wasn't a new socket I would be |
Isn't that a bit unfair? In recent years, Intel has released a new socket for every new gen of CPUs (s1366, s1155, s1156 and the coming s2011) and people didn't complain. Why can't AMD do it?
You could buy an AM3+ socket motherboard months ago while keeping your Phenom II or Athon II CPU and now just drop the a new Bulldozer CPU and it will work.
OT: I hope AMD delivers, as that would mean competition... so we (consumers) will win. And it looks like they might have something...
amd fx8150 to take on core i7 980x and 2600k on their price performance crown
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
I'll make sure when i get a new PC (next fall) it has one of these.
e=mc^2

Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)
JEMC said:
Isn't that a bit unfair? In recent years, Intel has released a new socket for every new gen of CPUs (s1366, s1155, s1156 and the coming s2011) and people didn't complain. Why can't AMD do it? You could buy an AM3+ socket motherboard months ago while keeping your Phenom II or Athon II CPU and now just drop the a new Bulldozer CPU and it will work. OT: I hope AMD delivers, as that would mean competition... so we (consumers) will win. And it looks like they might have something... amd fx8150 to take on core i7 980x and 2600k on their price performance crown |
I knew the FX-8150 would crush the i7's...
| Soleron said: I'm not and I am a huge AMD fan. After five years of waiting for a new architecture it comes up short to Intel in every way. |
AMD only really had one architecture that was superior to Intel's offerings at the same time period. Otherwise, they've always done well when it comes to price/performace ratio. I'm kinda hoping that that's the case with this one but I didn't think any official benchmarks had been released yet (the AMD marketing pics don't count
).
Snesboy said:
I knew the FX-8150 would crush the i7's... |
I wouldn't put too much trust into these benchmarks just yet. Wait for anandtech, tom's, etc.
In fact, I believe that Sandy Bridge is likely to retain its crown anyway.
Xen said:
I wouldn't put too much trust into these benchmarks just yet. Wait for anandtech, tom's, etc. In fact, I believe that Sandy Bridge is likely to retain its crown anyway. |
In single threaded aplications Sandy Bridge will win easily. But for AMD, being on par with an i7 980X CPU that costs more than twice is a huge success, specially with a lower power consumption and a better graphics part.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.