By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - If you want one of the big 3 to go the way of Sega, or want your preferred company to monopolize...

The best gens were the ones with only two real competitors so...
SNES vs. Genesis and PSX vs. N64...



"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius

Around the Network

If one of them absolutely had to go, I'd want it to be Sony.
While I love many of their games, (Uncharted 1 & 2, for example) I don't like their approach to hardware, particularly maintaining a PS1 era controller in this day and age. (Which they will probably keep for the PS4, which would be an absolute joke. Imagine if the Wii-U still used the N64 controller...)



Immortal said:
oniyide said:

what makes you think the other 2 will do so intentionally? Anyone can do unintentional harm to the industry, it will still be harm. PS was going to be an add-on. Sega already did that with the Sega CD, a while ago. How come Sega did not seem to have any issues?? or Atari or whoever made 3DO? Why did they stick with catridges all the way up to GC?? Nintendo, the video game producer couldnt get the CDs right?? Im not buying it. Still doesnt explain why they use minidisc for GC that put them at a disadvantage against PS Xbox

Online. I could see how that could be possible, but again this is NInty, I expected them to try harder, they could have had a better online and still do their motion or whatever, not say "screw it". Plus they could have updated through the years just like MS and Sony did. And their flippant attitude toward online doesnt help their case.

Its because of competition that the Wii was even made. YOu think Ninty would have even tried anything like Wii if they were not getting their asses kicked. They could not defeat MS and Sony in the hardware race so they decided to go a completly different route, OR maybe they would have made it anyway (like Sony made that eyetoy), im leaning more toward the former, but since we dont have access to an alternate universe, we could just assume

I believe I mentioned this in my original post. It's called adding Bluray to the PS3. A $600, heavily lossmaking, hell-to-develop-for console is pretty much a murder attempt at the industry.

And, for your second statement, you should realize that there's only so much we can prevent. Companies will do what they want. It may or may not harm the industry. You don't know until you try. The thing is, with MS and Sony, we know there are some times that they will intentionally try to kill the industry because it's still good for them. On top of that, they'll still make the normal mistakes that Nintendo makes. Meaning that, in all likelihood, a higher proprtion of decisions that harm the industry occurs with them in important video game-related positions.

As far as your accusation against Nintendo goes, you've got to be joking. Nintendo's research on the Playstation goes back as far as 1986 according to Wikipedia. If you haven't noticed, Nintendo has a history of waiting to get things right for their successful consoles (GBC came way after colour was common, for example) with the VB as the only real exception. They were going to do it with the SNES-CD. It didn't work. Playstation happened and destroyed their monopoly. They tried it with Philips. CDi happened, making Nintendo franchises a joke. They tried twice, even with horrible reprecussions the first time. Even with the limitless CD-based failures preceding it (I thank you for mentioning Sega CD and 3DO here). They were trying too hard, almost.

And your hate for mini-DVDs is completely unjustified. They weren't particularly inferior to normal ones, not enough to make GC less powerful than the PS2, at least. They were just avoiding unnecessary DVD licensing issues, or something to that effect, which is not shocking considering the whole drama with PS eating them alive. These were in fact better in some ways. Harder to pirate, apparently.

As for Wii's online, nobody was ever going to buy Wii for its online. Ever. It was doomed to be technically worse from the start. Anything else would have driven Nintendo bankrupt. Think from Nintendo's perspective here. Why the hell should I bother to work on online at all? If I don't, people say, "Wii has worse online than others". If I do, people say, "Wii has worse online than others". The reason they haven't bothered afterwards is because it won't help. Those who want the best online experience will necessarily go to the competition because Nintendo can't possibly better them at this point.

Now, while the last part is true, you should realize that the Wii was a random, unexpected move. The bad publicity it got before/near launch is evidence of that. Nintendo did it, but it was clearly an abnormal result of competition. An exception to the rule, almost. Plus, in this alternate, Nintendo-dominating universe, think of what the Wii would be like. I mean, as RolStoppable said, the GBA is a fantastic example to go by. A console with good specs, Wii-plus online, better control, all of Wii's non-motion-oriented fun games and likely a "Wii add-on" somewhere down the line, starting with some ~$299 as its launch price. By the end of its life, it would pretty much be better than the Wii. That doesn't look bad to me at all.

 

By the way, any of the non-opinion information I posted comes from Wikipedia. If I'm factually wrong, I am not to blame, :P.

i agree with the first paragraph, but where are the examples of MS and Sony hurting the industry?

2nd bolded, interesting, i didnt know the Sony thing was that far back. And your right about philips that sucked, but i still dont understand why they just didnt go it ALONE. Sega CD and 3do did and failed, but they arent Ninty i would have imagined that Ninty would have done better. But even when they did, it wasnt all that. Hell they even made statements saying that cartridges were still the best way to go, which IMHO means they were never fully commited to the CD format in th first place

3rd bolded anyone who knows my posting histroy knows i love the GC, better than Wii i have no hate for mini discs, but they COULD not hold as much information as a DVD, which lead to some games having to have levels cut from them. So your paying the same price for the game as PS2 Xbox and you are getting less content.(not always the case) you tell me how this was better for us



Improve? i.e. the objective term? None of them.

In terms of my personal enjoyment I would be happier with MS out of the picture. They are 1 of 2 companies suppressing the style of FPS that I enjoy, and they are also leading the charge against local multiplayer.



@immortal at the online part, i can see your point, but the fact they didnt even try is still weak sauce to me

as for your last part, interesting. but wasnt there a NeoGeo Pocket and Wonderswan around the GBA time?? THey were not worth a crap, but it still wasnt a true monopoly



Around the Network

i want sega to come back, 4 consoles would be better, id drop the ps3 and 360 for a new sega console



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

oniyide said:

i agree with the first paragraph, but where are the examples of MS and Sony hurting the industry?

2nd bolded, interesting, i didnt know the Sony thing was that far back. And your right about philips that sucked, but i still dont understand why they just didnt go it ALONE. Sega CD and 3do did and failed, but they arent Ninty i would have imagined that Ninty would have done better. But even when they did, it wasnt all that. Hell they even made statements saying that cartridges were still the best way to go, which IMHO means they were never fully commited to the CD format in th first place

3rd bolded anyone who knows my posting histroy knows i love the GC, better than Wii i have no hate for mini discs, but they COULD not hold as much information as a DVD, which lead to some games having to have levels cut from them. So your paying the same price for the game as PS2 Xbox and you are getting less content.(not always the case) you tell me how this was better for us

It was in my very first statement. The premature Bluray thing. It hurt the industry in as many ways as possible. I don't even need examples, though. It's common sense. Companies only see what's good for them and that goes for Nintendo, too. Sony and MS have other priorities. Nintendo doesn't.

The reason they didn't during N64 was likely because, until then, they'd been trying with Sony and Philips. If they tried on their own just after that, it would be rushed and end up as bad or worse than the Sega CD. And, after being forced by these circumstances not to go the CD route, do you think Nintendo would praise its competition for having CDs? Hell no. They had to try and convince everyone else that CDs were worthless so that the PS1 scenario wouldn't happen (which it did).

For your third point, I refer you to RolStoppable's post.

As for your other points, Wii's online may be "weak sauce", but I've already explained why Nintendo didn't bother. Blame the competition here, :P. And, for GBA's competition, sure, there were some companies who tried, but, since they didn't affect Nintendo's decisions in the least, they're irrelevant. By the end of the generation, it was more of a monopoly than almost any situation in gaming has ever been.



 

“These are my principles; if you don’t like them, I have others.” – Groucho Marx

Skeeuk said:

i want sega to come back, 4 consoles would be better, id drop the ps3 and 360 for a new sega console


Amen!



/../

Mr Khan said:
Calling doom is different from wanting them to leave altogether. We just want helpless irrelevance


this quoting is irevlivent of this topic, i just wanted to say all those women in your sig are going to have cronic back pain later on in life ;)

let the topic proceeed!! "sounds of trumpets"



Nintendo has shown that they get arrogant and lazy instantly once in a position of power, so I would never want them to monopolize again unless its the handheld circuit. They need their backs against the ropes in order to produce content that we actually want.

Microsoft can go 3rd party definitely. Outside of Gears and Halo, they don't really have an exclusive presence to speak of. However, their first party efforts are mediocre at best; if not in the console wars they would probably just back out. They only entered in 2001 to combat Sony anyways.

Sony would be in the best position to go 3rd party but we need some type of competition around to combat Nintendo. Sony in a Sega position would be excellent though because they are capable of high game output and have many studios. It could potentially be bery profitable for them without having to deal with hardware production.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."