By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Duke Nukem gets an extremely rare 0/10 review.

NYANKS on 16 June 2011
ethomaz said:
NYANKS said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Metacritic 49 ...soon it is going in the top 50 worst games ever.

Which is ridiculous because it is clearly not that bad.  These reviewers are going to far now.  See, this just shows how unbelievably childish our review system can be, and subsequently explains why no real gamer should let reviews tell them exactly what to play.  You will miss fun games in the shuffle.

IGN attacked Duke for being somewhat childish and for not progressing much from the base humor and crudeness that was in the original.  F*CKING REALLY?  That's the whole damn point of Duke Nukem.

Reviewers shoud take a lot of flak for this b.s.

No. It is meh . The 50 Metacrict just show how mediocre the game is.

Ethomaz.....think hard about what games would be in the top 50 bad games.  Even IGN admitted the actual gameplay was pretty solid.....that pretty much excludes it from the list right there.

Edit:  Lol, did you edit your post!



Around the Network
narog on 16 June 2011

Mindjack have a D and DNF an F from 1UP.

Mindjack AI doesn't work at all and the script dont make sense also the game have some game killing glitches

So basically 1UP recommend more games that dont work over games that are dated

here is a video that shows mindjack glitches http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK4u4uezIPM



ethomaz on 16 June 2011
NYANKS said:
ethomaz said:
NYANKS said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Metacritic 49 ...soon it is going in the top 50 worst games ever.

Which is ridiculous because it is clearly not that bad.  These reviewers are going to far now.  See, this just shows how unbelievably childish our review system can be, and subsequently explains why no real gamer should let reviews tell them exactly what to play.  You will miss fun games in the shuffle.

IGN attacked Duke for being somewhat childish and for not progressing much from the base humor and crudeness that was in the original.  F*CKING REALLY?  That's the whole damn point of Duke Nukem.

Reviewers shoud take a lot of flak for this b.s.

No. It is meh . The 50 Metacrict just show how mediocre the game is.

Ethomaz.....think hard about what games would be in the top 50 bad games.  Even IGN admitted the actual gameplay was pretty solid.....that pretty much excludes it from the list right there.

Edit:  Lol, did you edit your post!

Shadow edit .

I don't think a 50-60 a bad game... just mediam... almost good.

People here thinks if a game not receive a 85-100 metacritic it is not good... but 85-100 is great... good is just 60-80.



welshbloke on 16 June 2011

1up have not done themselves any favours this game might not light the world on fire but it is millions miles away from 0 or F



W.L.B.B. Member, Portsmouth Branch.

(Welsh(Folk) Living Beyond Borders)

Winner of the 2010 VGC Holiday sales prediction thread with an Average 1.6% accuracy rating. I am indeed awesome.

Kinect as seen by PS3 owners ...if you can pick at it   ...post it ... Did I mention the 360 was black and Shinny? Keeping Sigs obscure since 2007, Passed by the Sig police 5July10.
NYANKS on 16 June 2011
ethomaz said:
NYANKS said:
ethomaz said:
NYANKS said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Metacritic 49 ...soon it is going in the top 50 worst games ever.

Which is ridiculous because it is clearly not that bad.  These reviewers are going to far now.  See, this just shows how unbelievably childish our review system can be, and subsequently explains why no real gamer should let reviews tell them exactly what to play.  You will miss fun games in the shuffle.

IGN attacked Duke for being somewhat childish and for not progressing much from the base humor and crudeness that was in the original.  F*CKING REALLY?  That's the whole damn point of Duke Nukem.

Reviewers shoud take a lot of flak for this b.s.

No. It is meh . The 50 Metacrict just show how mediocre the game is.

Ethomaz.....think hard about what games would be in the top 50 bad games.  Even IGN admitted the actual gameplay was pretty solid.....that pretty much excludes it from the list right there.

Edit:  Lol, did you edit your post!

Shadow edit .

I don't think a 50-60 a bad game... just mediam... almost good.

People here thinks if a game not receive a 85-100 metacritic it is not good... but 85-100 is great... good is just 60-80.

Oh ok.  Most people don't think that nowadays.  That's good then.  Too bad a lot of reviewers also think like those 85-100 people  :(

Criticizing Duke for not changing is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.  Duke is crude and uncompromising, it's why he's loved.



Around the Network
Chevinator123 on 16 June 2011

the only game that would deserve a 0/10 is...

"press start to play"
*Presses start*
"Thanks for your money fk you"
"GAME OVER"



Xen on 16 June 2011
Chevinator123 said:
the only game that would deserve a 0/10 is...

"press start to play"
*Presses start*
"Thanks for your money fk you"
"GAME OVER"

That, and action 52.



Barozi on 16 June 2011
Xen said:
Chevinator123 said:
the only game that would deserve a 0/10 is...

"press start to play"
*Presses start*
"Thanks for your money fk you"
"GAME OVER"

That, and action 52.

I thought that's the exact same game



melbye on 16 June 2011

It seems people have been brainwashed by Call of Duty



Xen on 16 June 2011
Barozi said:
Xen said:
Chevinator123 said:
the only game that would deserve a 0/10 is...

"press start to play"
*Presses start*
"Thanks for your money fk you"
"GAME OVER"

That, and action 52.

I thought that's the exact same game

Not really.

Action 52 doesn't tell you to go f- yourself.