Duke Nukem gets an extremely rare 0/10 review.

[ethomaz]

NYANKS said:

ethomaz said:

NYANKS said:

Lostplanet22 said:
Metacritic 49 ...soon it is going in the top 50 worst games ever.

Which is ridiculous because it is clearly not that bad.  These reviewers are going to far now.  See, this just shows how unbelievably childish our review system can be, and subsequently explains why no real gamer should let reviews tell them exactly what to play.  You will miss fun games in the shuffle.

IGN attacked Duke for being somewhat childish and for not progressing much from the base humor and crudeness that was in the original.  F*CKING REALLY?  That's the whole damn point of Duke Nukem.

Reviewers shoud take a lot of flak for this b.s.

No. It is meh . The 50 Metacrict just show how mediocre the game is.

Ethomaz.....think hard about what games would be in the top 50 bad games.  Even IGN admitted the actual gameplay was pretty solid.....that pretty much excludes it from the list right there.

Edit:  Lol, did you edit your post!

Shadow edit .

I don't think a 50-60 a bad game... just mediam... almost good.

People here thinks if a game not receive a 85-100 metacritic it is not good... but 85-100 is great... good is just 60-80.