Nobody one, everything sucked. 

All I'm stating is that your ignoring a huge part of MS and Sonys Library to fit your own preference, which is pretty ignorant on your behalf. When I do a game comparison I include ALL games, even if it's games I don't like personal like I still include it in an argument because at the end of the day a game is a game whether it's an arcade game, motion control, controller, casual or core. 

Sure buddy, sure.

Drake in Gears 3 would be hilarious. That man in the luckiest SOB around, he doesn't need armour to take down the Locust, just a pistol and a treasure.

I love the "I am unbiased"..

Then blatantly biased stance some people are taking.

Tbf I thought Sesame Street and the Disney demo's sucked ass. I probably said that before, and I'll say it again, I was on a verge of sleeping when watching E3, the Nintendo one bored me to death too and I ended up watching epic rap battles of history on YouTube, poor display this year, poor display indeed, I didn't even bother watching Sony one as I know if it was good there will be no end of the "SONY HATEZ MY WALLET!@!@!@" posts, since their presence is less lacksture than last year I'll assume that the Sony showing wasn't any better this year in regards to new titles hitting the shelves in the near future.

You said "I ignore kinect titles, not Xbox 360 core exclusives." Hence to you, not Kinect title appeals to the core audience. This is simply a matter of personal preference, and you take it too far. Ryse is more of a core game then almost anything shown at E3, it's made by freaken Crytek.

You keep pushing this too by saying "Microsoft has abandoned the core audience." and "Microsofts showing was considered the most underwhelming." Nowhere online do I read that 360 was underwhelming, or poor compared to the PS3 portion of the Sony show or the Wii portion of the Wii show. Compared to Sony and Nintendo's conferences as a whole, yes it got a lower grade, Nintendo and Sony have 4 consoles to talk about!

You push your opinion too much, and you shouldn't ignore casual games. A lot of core gamers look forward to these games too, like me with Dance Central 2. Yes it's designed for the casual gamer, but any real gamer who actually plays games before judging them, will enjoy this game. Especially since it's 2 player now.

The only games you should ignore are bad games, so ignoring those Disney Kinect titles, and maybe Star Wars is fine. Just don't ignore games you're not interested and then start claiming 360 has less games coming out then PS3. Face it, almost everyone in this thread accepts 360 had a better E3 then PS3's portion of Sony's E3. Just accept it and move on. If you're not interested in these games, then don't bother talking about them. Do you ever see me go on about Resistance, or LittleBigPlanet? No I don't like those games, but I do go on about GT5, Forza 4, Halo, Gears and Uncharted.

P.S. in 2010 360 saw 31 exclusives (8 good ones), PS3 saw 15 exclusives (11 good ones). So no 2010 was a tie, only in 2011 did PS3 start to see more exclusives. 1 Year hardly qualifies a trend, especially since 2012 is looking to be better on the 360. Stop acting as if 360 has no core games, most of them just moved to Kinect, it doesn't mean games like Ryse and Fable aren't core anymore because of it.

If you didn't watch the Sony press conference, why are you posting in this thread?

Also the issue isn't wheather or not Disneyland and Sesame St. are good or not, it's are Fable and Ryse "core" games? I say yes, and so do most people here. So for any comparission between PS3 and 360, they should be included. It doesn't matter that they are Kinect, they are still mainstream games.

Exactly! Just because Ryse and Fable are Kinect games, does that make them less appealing to the core? The point of Ryse is to be able to fight enemies real life, and gouge their eyes out with your hands not a button. Tell me how is that casual.

You can't ignore games just because you're not interested in them. We all know Ryse, Fable and Dance Central appeal to core gamers as well, and will push some systems (at the point in a consoles life, 1 game won't push too many systems).

Because the OP didn't at the time posting? I see no reason as to why I should watch a conference in which I have least interest in, I am not the one for handhelds, and it was mainly handheld orientated going by the sounds of it.

Only watched Nintendo because a friend wanted to, and I was semi interested in the new console, 'till I found out what it was, the announcement was the most boring thing since the last part(excluding Halo4 announcement) MS conference I watched a day earlier.

I think Ryse can be classed as core, Fable just looks too f'ing casual and just shit in general.

So, result. We got about 3/4 core kinect compatible titles coming out - Ryse, Forza4, Ghost Recon, ME3 and Minecraft if it can be classed as one.

They should make COD kinect compatible, that'd sell millions in itself.

I was a man of "Wait and see if there are more core titles coming out before dismissing the hardware", I find myself in doubt after this E3.

I'm not sure what to make of the last sentance. Are you happy with 360's lineup, and do the "core" Kinect games satisfy you or not?

I'm personally meh. Kinect is way too expensive for me, and it's come way too late in the consoles life. I'd rather just borrow my friends, and beat the 2-3 good games for it as rentals. Rather save the $100-$150 for a next gen console.