By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Hacking Group: "It's the beginning of the end for Sony"

o_O.Q said:
brendude13 said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:
o_O.Q said:

do you own a ps3?


Why does it matter? 

it matters because obviously you didn't play the game during that period and trherefore you do not understand what happened... the hacks im speaking of are not host leaving or whatever im talking about game breaking advantages

Ok I will back you up here.

Yes, Call of Duty in that time period was unplayable, so unplayable that I went out and bought the XBOX 360 version.

MW2 has been fixed now but COD4 still suffers a bit.

exactly thats my point dsist6er who obviously didn't play the game on psn doesn't understand that

I'm sorry but how the hell did they manage to turn this into an argument?

I am sick of people commenting who have no idea what they are talking about. They just disagree with you for the sake of it.



Around the Network
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:

And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that? 


before geohot this never happened :

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/

you know before these games released: January 5th

StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
 
January 11th

DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica

cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.

http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/

you lost me


I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.

you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?


because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.

the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost

again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.


i didn't say he did i said that he posted the most vital part of the hacking process therefore without him and thus the keys the majority of the hacking would not have occured

is that really that hard to understand?

so what are you saying the hacking ( for that period ) would have occured without him posting the keys?

i could care less if what he did was illegal or not the point is that what he did adversely affected sony, its partners and its customers adversely



brendude13 said:
o_O.Q said:
brendude13 said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:
o_O.Q said:

do you own a ps3?


Why does it matter? 

it matters because obviously you didn't play the game during that period and trherefore you do not understand what happened... the hacks im speaking of are not host leaving or whatever im talking about game breaking advantages

Ok I will back you up here.

Yes, Call of Duty in that time period was unplayable, so unplayable that I went out and bought the XBOX 360 version.

MW2 has been fixed now but COD4 still suffers a bit.

exactly thats my point dsist6er who obviously didn't play the game on psn doesn't understand that

I'm sorry but how the hell did they manage to turn this into an argument?

I am sick of people commenting who have no idea what they are talking about. They just disagree with you for the sake of it.


You need to read a few more post up  brendude13.

dsister never said it did not happen or didnt exist.  He saif it was patech which is true. o_O.Q has been trying to make some weird points from some unrelating things is all.



thranx said:
Rpruett said:
thranx said:
Rpruett said:
thranx said:
 

To all of the above, you said "smart business decision"I was respnind as if i was sony and what would have been smart for them, so yes it would of come of as how they run their business and would it amke money, that is genraly thought of as smart business decisions. 

 

You don't open your product up to piracy willingly (Without a fight) unless it becomes a pointless effort that is losing you money.

In my opinion, it saved them tons of money because now there is some fear in owners messing with their PS3. 

 We will proably agree in those since they dont involve sony. Bu for thread its about sony, so please stick to the topic. 

I have no 'Love' for Sony.  I do prefer the PS3 to Wii / 360 that's a matter of game preference however.   I'm not even entirely against piracy for that matter.

I just find it funny.  I feel I am pretty realistic about it.  If you or I or anyone else owned a business and someone was easily taking your product and obtaining it for free you the business owner would not like that.

I feel Sony (Or any other company) has every right to try and protect their goods and services using the legal system. I can understand operating a business (Which is your and every employees living.)

I don't have a problem with Geohot doing what he did, but it can be legally punishable (And trying to defend him as some White Knight is just hilarious to me.)  when he clearly could be found guilty.

The guy was trying to crack the PS3 to do a whole host of things to it, one of those things being playing software illegally.  He maybe never admitted it but we all know deep down that was one of the several reasons for doing it. 

 

I love when these threads come up because the typical Sony haters come out in full force (Just like when the negative MS threads come out).   It's just funny.  Stop trying to manipulate your dislike for Sony into a tangible point.













thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:

And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that? 


before geohot this never happened :

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/

you know before these games released: January 5th

StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
 
January 11th

DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica

cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.

http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/

you lost me


I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.

you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?


because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.

the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost

again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.

 

For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy. You are trying to give him credit for actions he did not commit. I am doing the same thing, the release of those games had nothing to do with hacking the psn or piracy, but they happened before the event of the cod hacking. So by your logoic they are to blame. Seems kind of stupid huh?

"For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy"

lol good lord i see i have to break this down a little more

ok lets say for example i know murderer who wants to kill someone i know if i give the murderer the address and means to access that person am i not to some extent at fault for it? wouldn't the courts see me as an accomplice?



Around the Network
Galaki said:
steverhcp02 said:

Yeap, enjoy it now when its on a gaming forum against a company you dont like because whether you like it or not, these companies viablilty in the real world mean a lot more than people here so cavalierly ignore. The only thing thats going to come of this is increased consumer costs to maintain protection and probably stricter laws and limited consumer rights and or functionality. So get all your laughs in now because if this keeps up and/or spreads and companies post losses because of this real families who get let go will suffer.

Its fun to hate the big bad corperation until you grow up and realize that your neighbor gets a paycheck from a Sony distrubutor and hes the one who suffers, not "Sony"

By your logic, Sony should not have protection at all to make things cheaper. Banks shouldn't need safes neither, all they do is add costs.

No, by my logic it means ina field im more familiar with because i work at a hospital, malpractice insurence costs doctors not only a ton of money but limits the scope of medicine because its far too prevalent for people to blame doctors or nurses for things that are either inevitable or unavoidable so we cant always practice aggressive medicine and we always have to settle for the lowest common denominator for fear of being sued.

What im saying is, by these groups doing this, its like ambulance chasers or lawsuit peddling lawyers to doctors....its going to make IT companies or companies with infrastructure online tighten their reigns for fear of being cracked.

So you say thats good, but the problem is still the cirminals not the entry to information. In a perfect world yes there would be no cost to protect data because we could all just respect one another but thats not a possibility, people intentionally trying to steal data by any means necessary thus provoking increased cost is wrong.

You seem to be insinuating that these people forcing sony to tighten security are doing us a favor....but at what cost? In the future we may not have the ability to manipulate our HD's and increase size, we may not have cross platform play, open network to upload user created content etc.

Rather than focusing on the real issue (and im not even sure what it is anymore since people are so caught up on either destroying Sony or destroying hackers) people just take hold of the rhetoric.

Im for increased gun control but i dont go buy guns and shoot them in public (not at people just to scare them) to show people how it needs to happen.

There are better more intelligent, mature and sophisticated legal ways to fight for consumer protection and consumer rights no matter what you people try to say.



o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:

And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that? 


before geohot this never happened :

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/

you know before these games released: January 5th

StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
 
January 11th

DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica

cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.

http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/

you lost me


I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.

you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?


because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.

the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost

again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.


i didn't say he did i said that he posted the most vital part of the hacking process therefore without him and thus the keys the majority of the hacking would not have occured

is that really that hard to understand?

so what are you saying the hacking ( for that period ) would have occured without him posting the keys?

i could care less if what he did was illegal or not the point is that what he did adversely affected sony, its partners and its customers adversely


And I am saying what he did did not do that. Blame the hackers that did. You are trying to put the blame on him instead of the hackers that caused the problme. Just seperate the isssues that is all. What you are doing is putting piracy is the same boat as consumer rights. other hacker aldready had those keys. if i rember correctly he was not even the one who found them. So again he did not casue your problems with PSN or piracy



o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:

And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that? 


before geohot this never happened :

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/

you know before these games released: January 5th

StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
 
January 11th

DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica

cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.

http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/

you lost me


I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.

you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?


because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.

the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost

again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.

 

For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy. You are trying to give him credit for actions he did not commit. I am doing the same thing, the release of those games had nothing to do with hacking the psn or piracy, but they happened before the event of the cod hacking. So by your logoic they are to blame. Seems kind of stupid huh?

"For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy"

lol good lord i see i have to break this down a little more

ok lets say for example i know murderer who wants to kill someone i know if i give the murderer the address and means to access that person am i not to some extent at fault for it? wouldn't the courts see me as an accomplice?

no not quite, more like blame the knife or gun company that hte muderer used his weapon from. It would be different if he conspired with the pirates/psn hacker but he did not. Releasing info like that is legal. Just like it is legal to release info how to build any manner of bombs and weapons. Again he did not cause the PSN hacking. Do some research please. I am getting dizzzy from going in circles and repeatin myslef.



thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:

And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that? 


before geohot this never happened :

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/

you know before these games released: January 5th

StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
 
January 11th

DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica

cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.

http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/

you lost me


I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.

you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?


because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.

the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost

again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.


i didn't say he did i said that he posted the most vital part of the hacking process therefore without him and thus the keys the majority of the hacking would not have occured

is that really that hard to understand?

so what are you saying the hacking ( for that period ) would have occured without him posting the keys?

i could care less if what he did was illegal or not the point is that what he did adversely affected sony, its partners and its customers adversely


And I am saying what he did did not do that. Blame the hackers that did. You are trying to put the blame on him instead of the hackers that caused the problme. Just seperate the isssues that is all. What you are doing is putting piracy is the same boat as consumer rights. other hacker aldready had those keys. if i rember correctly he was not even the one who found them. So again he did not casue your problems with PSN or piracy


"And I am saying what he did did not do that" he did not do what? this :

http://psgroove.com/content.php?598-GeoHot-Releases-Metldr-Key-All-PS3-Keys-Now-Vulnerable

so you mean to tell me that him releasing those keys did not result in an explosion in hacks? and that events like these ( that only happened after his release of the keys ) were not contributed to in anyway by his actions above? if so im afraid i'm the one who has hit a brick wall

www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack

him doing hacks or piracy on his own is not the problem never was but when he does things that affects consumers then hes taking it way too far which is what he did

 



I only have one serious question regarding this... What is their power level ?

 

 

Are we talkin.. 2.500 ?.. 5000 ?



Check out my game about moles ^