o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
thranx said:
o_O.Q said:
dsister said:
And there was piracy before Geohot... why do people forget that?
|
before geohot this never happened :
www.gamefront.com/call-of-duty-multiplayer-now-unplayable-thanks-to-ps3 -hack/
|
you know before these games released: January 5th
StarDrone (PSN exclusive)
MicroBot (PSN)
January 11th
DC Universe Online (PC/PS3 exclusive)
Venetica
cod was fine to play, but after they released it wasn't.I think these devs need to be punished, look what they did to the psn.
http://www.ps3center.net/news/4940/ps3-releases-for-january-2011/
|
you lost me
|
I thought i would. I guess this convo is over. I know when I have hit a brickwall.
|
you lost me because you brought up something completely irrelevant to what we were discussing how do those games or the dates they were released correlate with hacks in an online game?
|
because its just as irrelevant as your point of geohot you know the one i qouted. Funny you couldn't see it. It comes down to you blaming geohot when you should be blaming the hackers that hacked the PSN. Thats all.
|
the difference is that because of his actions all of this occured so you still have me lost
|
again show me where he hacked the psn or pirated? Sony couldn't so I doubt you could. They are unrelated. ONe is legal to do one is not. You cant seem to reconcile this fact. I dont know what else to tell you.
For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy. You are trying to give him credit for actions he did not commit. I am doing the same thing, the release of those games had nothing to do with hacking the psn or piracy, but they happened before the event of the cod hacking. So by your logoic they are to blame. Seems kind of stupid huh?
|
"For your point to make sence " his actions" would have to involve hacking the psn or piracy"
lol good lord i see i have to break this down a little more
ok lets say for example i know murderer who wants to kill someone i know if i give the murderer the address and means to access that person am i not to some extent at fault for it? wouldn't the courts see me as an accomplice?
|
no not quite, more like blame the knife or gun company that hte muderer used his weapon from. It would be different if he conspired with the pirates/psn hacker but he did not. Releasing info like that is legal. Just like it is legal to release info how to build any manner of bombs and weapons. Again he did not cause the PSN hacking. Do some research please. I am getting dizzzy from going in circles and repeatin myslef.
