What should we do? What kind of dumbass question is that?
If the answer is anything other than be happy more people get to experience the game then you're simply wrong.
(and people crying about quality because of a port, it's easier to port from the PS3 to 360/PC than port 360/PC to PS3)
Ever since the disappointment of FF13 and the lack of any real info for v13, I kinda lost interest.
PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.
Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?
deskpro2k3 said:
Most of those games you listed pretty much fall under the same genra too. The gameplay is great, but it doesn't have that extra greatness in graphic tech which is something a decent amount of people care about, including myself. A lot of people fall for the hype, and then there are those who don't listen to critics. All i'm saying is, it is better to compare exclusives against exclusives. /end rant |
but.....your wrong.
GTA 4, Red Dead Redemption, Call of Duty 4, Call of Duty MW2, Bioshock, Street Fighter 4, Elder Scrolls Oblivion, and Assassins Creed 2 all have higher Metacritic's then every game you just listed besides Uncharted 2.
Also 7 out of the top 10 games for PS3 based on Metacritic are multi-plats, only 3 are exclusives. Basically the same way on the 360.
So no. Exclusives aren't generally considered better quality. At all.
| BenVTrigger said:
GTA 4, Red Dead Redemption, Call of Duty 4, Call of Duty MW2, Bioshock, Street Fighter 4, Elder Scrolls Oblivion, and Assassins Creed 2 all have higher Metacritic's then every game you just listed besides Uncharted 2. Also 7 out of the top 10 games for PS3 based on Metacritic are multi-plats, only 3 are exclusives. Basically the same way on the 360. So no. Exclusives aren't generally considered better quality. At all. |
Its a matter of percentage, not looking at certain exclusives or multiplatforms. I think its right to say that exclusive are generally considered better quality, but then again, it isnt solely because its easier to focus only on one console. Exclusives usually have bigger budget, more hype and support from the publisher. From my observations, its pretty common for multiplatforms to have lower scores than exclusives. You can always find exceptions, though. It would be too long to do it, but if someone have the percentage of multiplats below 60% (or 70%/80%) meta VS the percentage of exclusives below 60% (or 70%/80%)meta that would be interesting.
| NiKKoM said: I don't know what you guys are going to do... But I'll be eating popcorn.... with a smile..
|
Always fun watching Square fans!
"If you have a got an awesome girlfriend and then someone else gets an awesome girlfriend. you know who wins. everyone." - Kevin Butler
As long as the game quality isn't effected does it really matter how many platforms it is on.
correct me if I am wrong
stop me if I am bias
I love a good civilised debate (but only if we can learn something).
nothing. if you like it buy, if not then don't preorder the game
Acevil said:
Always fun watching Square fans! |
Enix had it right, that's why they were the superior and more valuable company. Why they left Wada and Square at the generic helm I'll never know.
I think Fukushima just wanted to retire.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
