deskpro2k3 said:
BenVTrigger said:
nostromos said:
Being multiplatform does hurt y enjoyement in a way. I think that when a game is released on a specific platform the quality tends to be better because the devellopers spent ressources on making a game good rather than thinking about all the potentially more sales that they can get, those games tend to lose their souls. However, a port of a game done by an external company doesn't bother me as much.
|
Its funny how people always say "exclusive are higher quality than multiplatform" whenever Assassins Creed, GTA4, Red Dead Redemption, Call of Duty, Battlefield Bad Company, Fallout 3, Batman Arkham Asylum, and Dead Space are just a few examples of excellent multiplatform games. Being exclusive means nothing other than lots of hype.
OT: If the game gets good reviews and your a Final Fantasy fan than pick it up for whichever system you prefer.
|
I take this personally. Are you seriously compering those multiplat games against exclusives? I can compare those games to Crysis, MGS4, Killzone2, GoW3, Uncharted1&2, Demon Souls, Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, Halo 1-3, Gears etc.
Most of those games you listed pretty much fall under the same genra too. The gameplay is great, but it doesn't have that extra greatness in graphic tech which is something a decent amount of people care about, including myself. A lot of people fall for the hype, and then there are those who don't listen to critics.
All i'm saying is, it is better to compare exclusives against exclusives. /end rant
|
but.....your wrong.
GTA 4, Red Dead Redemption, Call of Duty 4, Call of Duty MW2, Bioshock, Street Fighter 4, Elder Scrolls Oblivion, and Assassins Creed 2 all have higher Metacritic's then every game you just listed besides Uncharted 2.
Also 7 out of the top 10 games for PS3 based on Metacritic are multi-plats, only 3 are exclusives. Basically the same way on the 360.
So no. Exclusives aren't generally considered better quality. At all.
