DonFerrari said:
Chazore said:
It's a bit silly to suggest that MS has to up and move it's games to completely avoid Sony's release schedules, which in turn put MS in range of third party bulk release schedules.
May as well say they can't win at all, past present and future.
|
Have I suggested they have to? But considering the first half of the year is quieter, they certainly could give as much room for their title to have attention.
And on your talk about winning, they really have lost the 3 generations they have involved so far... will they win the next? Who knows, but I wouldn't bet.
Chazore said:
Well that and their system cost more in general, and hardly many devs knew how to properly use the power of the PS3 CPU at the time. They also ran into the situation MS is in now in regards to game ventures, with devs that didn't exactly pan out too well.
|
I wouldn't say their situation were similar to MS, but sure PS3 games and some of X1 games haven't been met with great sales.
|
MS didn't have the CPU issue, while Sony did, that's one difference between the two.
You didn't specifically say, but the way you had written the previous post made it sound as if MS is doomed with that release no matter what. This is why I believe it's better to say "they are doomed indefinitely" if the suggestion of releasing near competition's 1st party or third party competition is supposedly going to end in failure.
Them releasing within the quiet period would benefit them, rather than releasing during a busy and unstable period, that could easily have the title drowned out completely.
They didn't exactly lose the previous gen outright, certainly nowhere near the level they have lost this gen. It would be nice if they win the next, and the one after, because then we will see a paradigm shift.
Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see
So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"