By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Together with Days Gone, not sure they will get much limelight.

It's a bit silly to suggest that MS has to up and move it's games to completely avoid Sony's release schedules, which in turn put MS in range of third party bulk release schedules. 

May as well say they can't win at all, past present and future. 

Have I suggested they have to? But considering the first half of the year is quieter, they certainly could give as much room for their title to have attention.

And on your talk about winning, they really have lost the 3 generations they have involved so far... will they win the next? Who knows, but I wouldn't bet.

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Sony is profiting on the games for PS4 so they have no reason to stop releasing them. In PS3 they had to go even more out and a lot of games lost money, but I'm not sure that was better output all things considered.

Well that and their system cost more in general, and hardly many devs knew how to properly use the power of the PS3 CPU at the time. They also ran into the situation MS is in now in regards to game ventures, with devs that didn't exactly pan out too well.

I wouldn't say their situation were similar to MS, but sure PS3 games and some of X1 games haven't been met with great sales.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."