I simply ask where is the proof that Nintendo was using 1GB of ram and not allowing devs to use the 1GB of ram??.

Good question. From what I've observed, going back a gen to PS2/GC/XB1, devs/publishers got used to the "one coat of paint" method of putting games out - just make them for all 3 systems. Making an original Wii game that wouldn't port well to the other systems might not be financially sound.

Sometimes it IS a dev, like Rockstar, they refused to bring GTA to Nintendo during the GC, even though the system was capable of running it.

How does Nintendo cancel someone else's game?  It is not possible.  It does not make sense either.

If Manhunt for the Wii and Conker for the N64 (from a second party studio even!) made it to market, then Nintendo isn't going to stop anything.

But Nintendo fans don't buy Nintendo games for their graphics, Nintendo doesn't need any more of an edge to sell more than third parties because that happens anyway, and Nintendo benefits from third parties selling well on their system. Therefore, the alleged RAM crippling sounds more unlikely to me.

With third parties, they idn't see it as saying no to money because they weren't confident they would make money at all.

So then why do many Handheld games by third parties look better then or at least as good as first party games? Why do Handheld consoles get 3rd party support, but not the home platform?

Is Nintendo holding back on consoles only? If so why only consoles? Is it because only Japanese developers support Nintendo, so Nintendo only gives true specs to the handhelds, which see a lot more Japanese support? Or is this just bs?

did you ever say anything about the multiplatform title that was canceled? ie: was it necessarily a Japanese game?

For all we know it could be Aliens CM in which case nobody would call it an example of Nintendo treating 3rd parties like shit...

Regarding the exclusive that is now back on, I had a feeling if Nintendo were cancelling it, it was due to it competing with another release on the console. Not sure if that would be a 3rd or 1st party release, but your new information seems to confirm this general idea. It should be said that postponing a 3rd party release for a reason that possibly makes sense is a lot different than cancelling it altogether for no reason at all..

These two points make your original claim that Nintendo mistreats third parties somewhat weaker.

Never heard that and can't find it on the webz. Which developer is making this?

And as you word it now, the game is not cancelled but delayed because of competition (something that is not unusual).

Can't tell you what developer, sorry. The game WAS canceled, but revived just a few days later and postponed because of another, similar game would release around the same time.