NKAJ said:
im sorry but while most 3rd party gmaes do look better on xbox you cant keep saying xbox has better graphics because blah blah blah is coming out,say some games that actually ARE out,because good looking games are coming out on ps3 as well.xbox has a larger userbase and so it would be resonable to concentrate on that format more.btw in cod4 the developer guy actually said "you can see we put our best people on ps3,it shows" |
A. PS3 fans touted the excellent graphics on KZ2, while the game was in demo stages and long before.
B. I wrote, "The PS3 probably has more graphical potential than the 360, but the difference is much slighter than originally assumed."
C. No multiplat has had significant graphical superiority on the PS3, and most have been graphically superior on the 360.
D. This is basically the "KZ2 exists" argument, and a major reason that Sony even created that game, imo. To give people like you, this argument.
E. The CoD guy put his best people on the PS3 version, and it shows, because it's not inferior, like most other multiplats.
F. The only judge of graphical superiority is top end released games. The bar keeps being set higher.
Before KZ2, the best looking game on consoles was Gears 2. There is only one game currently released that looks better on a console than the top 360 game. That'll change, but so will the top 360 game, graphically, as Forza 3, and future high budget games are released. The difference in hd console graphics this gen is minute, and that is obvious to most people who judge them off of reality, and not presumption or hope. The PS3 has the best looking game right now. The 360 on average has a better looking library, and overall, there isn't much difference at all. Apples and oranges.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.