OMG I think The Source is so wrong this time.
| Dark Chaos said:
(1) And Michael Jordan wouldn't have won without Scottie Pippen. Ur point?? Look at all championship teams they always have atleast two superstars from Miami, San Antonio, Detroit, Boston. No player can do it on himself not even Jordan.
(2) You got to be kidding?? Take off your fanboy glasses. Here is a chart below for you. No explanation needed. It looks like Nintendo made more money than Sony during the PS2 gen. I know GBA is included but still they made a huge profit. Even with strong PS2, PSP sales last two years SONY took a huge loss. Comparison In US Dollars:
|
1.) Shaq was one of the most dominating players in the NBA. He is a level above Scottie Pippen or whomever else you are trying to reference. The simple fact is LeBron is a better all around player than Kobe Bryant and years younger and is leading the best team in the NBA currently.
2.) You can't even remotely begin to discern which financial numbers are Gamecube and GBA and GBA franchises. Gamecube almost assuredly didn't make Nintendo truck loads of money (As you implied).
i saw space jam. mike can take on mugs, charlie, ewing, johnson, and bradley by himself.
anyway 'its not even second' doesnt mean squat. for the first time ever the industry will have 3 viable platforms. it was always just the leader before. first time ever the 3rd place console will outsell previous first place systems
Psh Wii will sell more than 169... more like 200 million
We cannot just the year based on hearsay. After E3 when the main brands alongside developers tell us what we can expect from each console, we'll have a good idea of where we can push numbers. Right now it's up in the air where the 360 still holds a solid eight million console lead. What we can say now is that if Sony doesn't drop its price soon, then you can bet there will be a huge problem where the 360 might pull ahead to a ten million console lead. To say that the eight million lead will fall back to five million from last years 1st quarter lead is not impossible, but with the information we have, quite bold.
| TheSource said: I dont know why you quoted this, its a complete stab in the dark after the year ending March 2010. We have no idea on the timing of a) Price cuts b) New consoles c) New disruptive technologies d) The end of the "Great Repression" e) Major projects still to be released this generation f) the decline in support for the current systems
I'm also going to have a completely different outlook once Sony and Nintendo release their forecasts for the year ending March 2010 in May.
|
The worst part is that almost no one is going to read this post, as it's been shown many times that hardly anyone reads past the OP before stopping and posting.
Way to go, Darth. *sigh*

It makes sense sinse the X360 has been out a year longer then the PS3...everyone seems to be forgetting that.