By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - If you had to choose between only playing games you have already played and only playing games you have never played, what would you choose?

 

If you had to choose between only playing games you have already played and only playing games you have never played, what would you choose?

I'd rather play only game... 18 56.25%
 
I'd rather play only game... 14 43.75%
 
Total:32
JackHandy said:
curl-6 said:

I do enjoy nostalgia, but the pleasure of experiencing something new for the first time is just stronger for me, like how a freshly cooked meal always tastes better than reheated leftovers.

Well, you're young, so I guess that makes sense. Twenty years from now, however... lol.

I'm certainly not as old as some of this site, but I'm old enough to remember the transition from sprites to 3D and cartridges to discs. There are plenty of great games from the past that I'll enjoy replaying for years to come, but my brain craves the novelty and excitement of new experiences and a game's first playthrough just hits different for me.



Around the Network

This is long story.
I like to test new games to me BUT I like version comparisons to see differences...



Video games and consoles collector from Poland.

No game is better then ff7..soo replaying rather then new



I've played games for longer than I have expected lifetime left.
If we include everything I've at least tried a little bit or didn't finish, there'd be well enough to play for me.
And I couldn't give up all my favorites. Rather never again play anything new.



I think I’ll expand a little on what I wrote in my first post.
First, yes, as an 80s kid, it was very normal to play a game over and over again. First and foremost, people complain about the prices of video game today, but they used to be substantially more… especially if you were importing. A simple fighting game from Japan might be the equivalent of 200 USD. Also games were shorter. The major drive for players of this time when playing videogames was not “beating it and moving on” it was how fucking good you could get at the existing game.

The other rationale I’d give are that there is a tremendous amount of gaming history that I consider foundational in my development as a human being. We had a thread about this the other day (I forget if I answered it, I at least began a draft of an answer! Maybe I’ll get to that thread… ADHD, I use timers all over the place now so generally there’s one post an every few days I don’t finish… although, might change that since I found a med that really works for me… obviously, because of this mini-rant, it hasn’t kicked in yet!). But abandoning the DKC trilogy, Sobic, Super Mario, Final Fantasy, and even more recent ones like Dwarf Fortress, Witcher 3, Chrobo Trigger, Xenogears.. that would truly be a shame. Because games are art (much of the time), and while new games often do amazing things, nothing has quite done what Chrono Teigger or Xenogears has done, even Super Mario Bros 3 has been copied a lot but never replicated (as pointed out, that might be the result of a nostalgia bias).

Don’t get me wrong, I like new games. Love them even. And unlike many, I think this period has been one of the best in memory for releases with remasters, remakes, and a lot of interesting innovations. I know there is a lot of hate for Civ 7, but it is honestly the most fun I have had with a Civ game since 2… warfare is fucking great! Witcher 3 Remastered for Switch 2 is such a dramatic improvement (although, I guess technically an old game).


Hey, that reminds me, do remasters (including remakes that keep most or all of the content design) go into the old game or new game pool in this thought experiment? Because, if that’s the case, I’d change to new because of the high chance most of my favourite games will get remastered again. I understand full remakes (like FF7 series) being in the new pile; but what about a game like Witcher 3 Remaster? What about Switch 2 Edition Remasters? What about games that are in the middle like Dragon Quest HD2D which are mostly new but retain a ton?



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network

For those voting in the first option, imagine watching trailers and gameplays of the new entries on your favorite franchise and you not being able to play them



CourageTCD said:

For those voting in the first option, imagine watching trailers and gameplays of the new entries on your favorite franchise and you not being able to play them

Imo, they're all shadows of what they use to be anyway, so I don't mind. Gaming now is mostly about redundancy. It's like the telephone in the 90's. There's little to no innovation going on. It's just there. Just part of life. Back in my day, it was being invented. The road was being created. Everything was epic, everything was mind-blowing, and you were experiencing games and consoles you literally couldn't even dream of before, and it was happening every five years or so. That isn't today's industry. Not even close.

And then, like I said earlier in the thread, if you throw in AI, which is literally almost in everything now (and only going to get worse), well...



This was a tough choice, because a lot of modern games suck and take a long time to release. But there are a lot of new (to me) games that were released in the past, not to mention indie games. In the end, my favorite thing about gaming is experiencing something that I've never experienced before, and I can only do that through new (to me) games.



Those who selected option 2 are going to feel might silly if we find out that the world will end next year. You'd have a very small selection of games to choose from!



Well when you die, games collection doesn't follow you. So it's better to have experienced as much as you can, so when you look back, you have more fond memories