By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Trump administration considers new tariffs on gaming hardware

Shadow1980 said:
SanAndreasX said:

Let's hope. Sadly, even with the economic, political, social, and even medical shitshow that is this administration, there is no path to a 67-seat supermajority in the Senate.

The Orange Clown has 29 months left in his term (and the day he's out of office can't come soon enough). A Dem-controlled Congress would hamper Trump's ability to do much of anything. He'd be a lame duck at that point, like Dubya after the 2006 midterms. I also say that if the Dems retake the Senate in 2026 and keep it and also win the White House in 2028, they should go for broke and nuke the filibuster. Fuck it. Let it ride. Push through every reform they can.

End the pointless trade wars. Implement Medicare-for-All. Ban all new "A.I." data centers and go after the companies for copyright violations and investigate them on how their TTI and TTV models can generate CSAM (I'd even go so far as to say they should ban generative "A.I." as commercial product; treat it as an existential threat to society, which it is). Ban gerrymandering, preferably by implementing proportional representation. Make ranked-choice voting the norm for Senate and presidential contests. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Rebuild the government agencies Trump wrecked or shut down. Expand the SCOTUS and implement term limits for justices. Make DC and Puerto Rico states. Recognize Palestine as a sovereign state and force an end to the genocide (hopefully by 2028 there's enough progressive or otherwise sympathetic Dems in Congress to make this happen).

Let their policies stand on their own merits, and if the people like them (and most voters tend to side with progressives when asked about most specific policies, so long as it's framed honestly), then next time the GOP is in charge (because politics is a pendulum and sooner or later the Dems will be holding the ball during rough economic times and incumbents always take the blame regardless of whether they're culpable) the Dems can double dog dare the GOP to undo everything the American people like in favor of once again wrecking the country for profit and spite. "Go ahead. Piss off the people. Take away everything we gave them that they like and actually works for them and see how that'll work out for you." At the very least nobody will have the excuse of "The other party is being obstructionists."

They had every opportunity to do that when Biden got elected and they controlled the Senate by the VP's tiebreaker vote. They could have used the nuclear option to change the rules of the Senate, which would only require 50 votes plus the VP. They had the votes. They simply chose not to. Democrats aren't there to help. They are there to give you the illusion of choice. And the choice is always picking between disastrous and bad. My country will never in a million years get a good president. At best we will simply have one bad president instead of one disastrous president. 



Around the Network
Cerebralbore101 said:
Shadow1980 said:

The Orange Clown has 29 months left in his term (and the day he's out of office can't come soon enough). A Dem-controlled Congress would hamper Trump's ability to do much of anything. He'd be a lame duck at that point, like Dubya after the 2006 midterms. I also say that if the Dems retake the Senate in 2026 and keep it and also win the White House in 2028, they should go for broke and nuke the filibuster. Fuck it. Let it ride. Push through every reform they can.

End the pointless trade wars. Implement Medicare-for-All. Ban all new "A.I." data centers and go after the companies for copyright violations and investigate them on how their TTI and TTV models can generate CSAM (I'd even go so far as to say they should ban generative "A.I." as commercial product; treat it as an existential threat to society, which it is). Ban gerrymandering, preferably by implementing proportional representation. Make ranked-choice voting the norm for Senate and presidential contests. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Rebuild the government agencies Trump wrecked or shut down. Expand the SCOTUS and implement term limits for justices. Make DC and Puerto Rico states. Recognize Palestine as a sovereign state and force an end to the genocide (hopefully by 2028 there's enough progressive or otherwise sympathetic Dems in Congress to make this happen).

Let their policies stand on their own merits, and if the people like them (and most voters tend to side with progressives when asked about most specific policies, so long as it's framed honestly), then next time the GOP is in charge (because politics is a pendulum and sooner or later the Dems will be holding the ball during rough economic times and incumbents always take the blame regardless of whether they're culpable) the Dems can double dog dare the GOP to undo everything the American people like in favor of once again wrecking the country for profit and spite. "Go ahead. Piss off the people. Take away everything we gave them that they like and actually works for them and see how that'll work out for you." At the very least nobody will have the excuse of "The other party is being obstructionists."

They had every opportunity to do that when Biden got elected and they controlled the Senate by the VP's tiebreaker vote. They could have used the nuclear option to change the rules of the Senate, which would only require 50 votes plus the VP. They had the votes. They simply chose not to. Democrats aren't there to help. They are there to give you the illusion of choice. And the choice is always picking between disastrous and bad. My country will never in a million years get a good president. At best we will simply have one bad president instead of one disastrous president. 

Center democrats like Manchin wouldn't let you go nuclear, just like republican have several center members that won't let them go nuclear. 



gerrymandering??? registered republicans in California 25.2% yet only hold approximately 15.38% of California's U.S. House of Representatives seats 



steve

2zosteven said:

gerrymandering??? registered republicans in California 25.2% yet only hold approximately 15.38% of California's U.S. House of Representatives seats 

Meanwhile, in Oklahoma, 27% of the voter base is Democratic. They have not only have absolute zero representation in Congress, but Oklahoma's congressional delegation is openly and vocally contemptuous of Oklahoma Democrats. They can pretty much afford to say that over one-fourth of their constituents are Godless trash. I know Oklahoma is smaller than California, but it still has five representatives, and 27% is more than enough for one or two Democratic representatives. They are also badly underrepresented in the state legislature. 8 members of the 48-member state senate, which is 12.5%. 20 members of the 101-member state house of representatives, which is 19.8%. 



Cerebralbore101 said:
Shadow1980 said:

The Orange Clown has 29 months left in his term (and the day he's out of office can't come soon enough). A Dem-controlled Congress would hamper Trump's ability to do much of anything. He'd be a lame duck at that point, like Dubya after the 2006 midterms. I also say that if the Dems retake the Senate in 2026 and keep it and also win the White House in 2028, they should go for broke and nuke the filibuster. Fuck it. Let it ride. Push through every reform they can.

End the pointless trade wars. Implement Medicare-for-All. Ban all new "A.I." data centers and go after the companies for copyright violations and investigate them on how their TTI and TTV models can generate CSAM (I'd even go so far as to say they should ban generative "A.I." as commercial product; treat it as an existential threat to society, which it is). Ban gerrymandering, preferably by implementing proportional representation. Make ranked-choice voting the norm for Senate and presidential contests. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Rebuild the government agencies Trump wrecked or shut down. Expand the SCOTUS and implement term limits for justices. Make DC and Puerto Rico states. Recognize Palestine as a sovereign state and force an end to the genocide (hopefully by 2028 there's enough progressive or otherwise sympathetic Dems in Congress to make this happen).

Let their policies stand on their own merits, and if the people like them (and most voters tend to side with progressives when asked about most specific policies, so long as it's framed honestly), then next time the GOP is in charge (because politics is a pendulum and sooner or later the Dems will be holding the ball during rough economic times and incumbents always take the blame regardless of whether they're culpable) the Dems can double dog dare the GOP to undo everything the American people like in favor of once again wrecking the country for profit and spite. "Go ahead. Piss off the people. Take away everything we gave them that they like and actually works for them and see how that'll work out for you." At the very least nobody will have the excuse of "The other party is being obstructionists."

They had every opportunity to do that when Biden got elected and they controlled the Senate by the VP's tiebreaker vote. They could have used the nuclear option to change the rules of the Senate, which would only require 50 votes plus the VP. They had the votes. They simply chose not to. Democrats aren't there to help. They are there to give you the illusion of choice. And the choice is always picking between disastrous and bad. My country will never in a million years get a good president. At best we will simply have one bad president instead of one disastrous president. 

In retrospect, Harry Reid did the country a bad disservice by invoking the nuclear option for judicial confirmations. He did so in order to get open judgeships filled that Senate Republicans were stonewalling. It didn't help when Antonin Scalia died and a Supreme Court seat opened up. McConnell simply refused to hold any hearings on any Obama judicial appointments on the grounds that the winner of the 2016 elections should get to pick his replacement, and then they easily rammed through Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney-Barrett, the latter just weeks before the 2020 elections. 

The filibuster is one of the few legislative tools left for Democrats to oppose some of the more onerous legislation.



Around the Network
JackHandy said:
SanAndreasX said:

Let's hope. Sadly, even with the economic, political, social, and even medical shitshow that is this administration, there is no path to a 67-seat supermajority in the Senate.

They won't need that. Even just taking the house back, dems can shut down most of his nonsense and send him and his people into a never-ending cycle of trials and subpoenas. But it's looking like the senate is in play, as well, and if that happens? Trump's minions would be better off resigning than sticking it out. It's going to be that painful for them.

A democrat supermajority in the Senate, or the House would be a disaster.  The best (realistic) thing for the US, and world, is gridlock in Washington.  Democrats are just as bad as Republicans.  They're mostly the same.  They just talk different.  



VAMatt said:
JackHandy said:

They won't need that. Even just taking the house back, dems can shut down most of his nonsense and send him and his people into a never-ending cycle of trials and subpoenas. But it's looking like the senate is in play, as well, and if that happens? Trump's minions would be better off resigning than sticking it out. It's going to be that painful for them.

A democrat supermajority in the Senate, or the House would be a disaster.  The best (realistic) thing for the US, and world, is gridlock in Washington.  Democrats are just as bad as Republicans.  They're mostly the same.  They just talk different.  

"Mostly" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.



2zosteven said:

gerrymandering??? registered republicans in California 25.2% yet only hold approximately 15.38% of California's U.S. House of Representatives seats 

Cute try.

In 2020 republicans won 11/53 seats, roughly 20%. In line with 25.

In 2022 it was 12/52 about 23%.

In 2018 it was 14/53, roughly 25%. Same for 2016.

In 2024 house elections, there were I believe six districts democrats won by less than 5 % including one they won by less than 3 and two which were decided by less than 1%. If Republicans had won 3 of those theyd have been at 23%. If they could have won 4, they would have hit 25%. Clearly winning around 25% was well within the realm of possibity.

The point of a fair map is not to ensure that representation is directly proportionate to registration. If that was the goal, we could just allocate seats according to party registration. The goal is, or at least should be, that the maps allow the opportunity for that to happen. Republicans had in 3 of the last four elections had representation within 5% of party registration. In 2024, they very clearly had that opportunity, but lost a few very close races. Clearly not gerrymandered maps.

Last edited by JWeinCom - 2 days ago

Jumpin said:

If Trump is the problem, then the solution is simple: so, why don’t you Americans just do what Ukraine did to Yanukovych? There isn’t anything stopping you except yourselves.

Personally, I think the reason you don’t do that is because you know as well as everyone else that Trump is merely a symptom of a much deeper problem. The real cancer is the American right wing, which is not conservative, but instead a mix of fascists and reactionaries. Your own government spits out anti-intellectual propaganda, and they are cheered by these anti-intellectual people who put them in office. That’s the cancer you should be dealing with. You can’t just leave it to continue to fester.

Pedolf Shitler is just the cult of personality. The problem is so deeply rooted, it would take drastic changes from education to culture and politics and politicians that would take decades to change. The ball started rolling decades ago and in some aspects how we got here began with the founding of the nation itself. 



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

Leynos said:
Jumpin said:

If Trump is the problem, then the solution is simple: so, why don’t you Americans just do what Ukraine did to Yanukovych? There isn’t anything stopping you except yourselves.

Personally, I think the reason you don’t do that is because you know as well as everyone else that Trump is merely a symptom of a much deeper problem. The real cancer is the American right wing, which is not conservative, but instead a mix of fascists and reactionaries. Your own government spits out anti-intellectual propaganda, and they are cheered by these anti-intellectual people who put them in office. That’s the cancer you should be dealing with. You can’t just leave it to continue to fester.

Pedolf Shitler is just the cult of personality. The problem is so deeply rooted, it would take drastic changes from education to culture and politics and politicians that would take decades to change. The ball started rolling decades ago and in some aspects how we got here began with the founding of the nation itself. 

And of course history explains a lot about many, if not even all, countries, or even regions, even small ones, within countries.