You can't believe how glad I am you said that:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/12/g7-leaders-called-hypocrites-attending-outdoor-events-weddings/

The politicans and the 'scientists' who told you to 'trust the science' didn't follow their own 'science'. They were in denial of their own 'microscope'. They refuted their own scientisim in plain sight of your ignorance.

What your sufferring from is a reality gap. Where you have used fake science and fantasy to provide a gap in your knowledge. Unless you have an alternate explaination as to why the scientists and politicans didn't trust their fake science?

Yet where is the evidence you claim proves there was a pandemic. You don't seem to grasp irony do you?

I'm actually so confident in what I'm saying I would suggest you keep getting boosters and you see what happens next. Nothing will happen to you... honest, because the paid Government scientist on the TV told me so...

"Politicians who are hypocrites are nothing new. This, however, does not disprove science. There are numerous examples of politicians not following their own advice and getting infected by COVID-19 because of it."

Your explaination of politicans disregarding their own science is that they are hyporcrities. Next time you state your opinion as fact please put 'imo' in front of what you say, because you are now engaging in conjecture that a politician or scientist didn't follow the rules because they are hypocrities, but there was still a killer virus that exisited because the lying politican told me so.

Your favourite example might not even be a real example. Its possibily fake news where the put that story out to scare people into getting the vaccine. In the same way you were told these vaccines were 'safe and effective' but they then admitted that they were causing severe adverse effects, like death.

I'm actually so confident in what I'm saying I would suggest you keep getting boosters and you see what happens next. Nothing will happen to you... honest, because the paid Government scientist on the TV told me so...

What your calling science is actually 'scientisim'. Theres plenty of evidence I can show you to prove there was never a pandemic. The whole thing was designed so you would take their posioned vaccine. A huge  part of that reason was so they could use the pandemic to change the voting laws in certain battleground states. You see the pandemic allowed them to allow mass mail in ballots which is unconstutional according to the individual state leglislatures. In doing so they were able to defraud the election so Joe Biden could mandate complusary vaccinations.

You can't believe how glad I am you said that:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/12/g7-leaders-called-hypocrites-attending-outdoor-events-weddings/

The politicans and the 'scientists' who told you to 'trust the science' didn't follow their own 'science'. They were in denial of their own 'microscope'. They refuted their own scientisim in plain sight of your ignorance.

What your sufferring from is a reality gap. Where you have used fake science and fantasy to provide a gap in your knowledge. Unless you have an alternate explaination as to why the scientists and politicans didn't trust their fake science?

Occam's Razor...

Word of advice, Google things first before saying them.

Well actually there is Professor Neil Fergurson who developed the UK Governments pandemic response yet was caught breaking the lockdown rules. A scientist who developed those rules didn't follow them himself. In fact while we are here, where is your proof there was a pandemic?

"That's an example of an indirect exemplar and the association fallacy to support your case"

It's an example of politicans who told you to 'trust the science' but didn't trust the science themselves. Yet you won't explain why the politicans didn't trust their fake science. You only avoid the point to escape your own fallacy.

I trust you can Google the word irony, since you don't seem to understand what that means either.

One more thing:

Occam's Razor. It applies here but your denial of observation prevents you from seeing the truth, hence why you won't answer the question.

"Politicians who are hypocrites are nothing new. This, however, does not disprove science. There are numerous examples of politicians not following their own advice and getting infected by COVID-19 because of it."

Your explaination of politicans disregarding their own science is that they are hyporcrities. Next time you state your opinion as fact please put 'imo' in front of what you say, because you are now engaging in conjecture that a politician or scientist didn't follow the rules because they are hypocrities, but there was still a killer virus that exisited because the lying politican told me so.

Your favourite example might not even be a real example. Its possibily fake news where the put that story out to scare people into getting the vaccine. In the same way you were told these vaccines were 'safe and effective' but they then admitted that they were causing severe adverse effects, like death.

I'm actually so confident in what I'm saying I would suggest you keep getting boosters and you see what happens next. Nothing will happen to you... honest, because the paid Government scientist on the TV told me so...

"Politicians who are hypocrites are nothing new. This, however, does not disprove science. There are numerous examples of politicians not following their own advice and getting infected by COVID-19 because of it."

Your explaination of politicans disregarding their own science is that they are hyporcrities. Next time you state your opinion as fact please put 'imo' in front of what you say, because you are now engaging in conjecture that a politician or scientist didn't follow the rules because they are hypocrities, but there was still a killer virus that exisited because the lying politican told me so.

Your favourite example might not even be a real example. Its possibily fake news where the put that story out to scare people into getting the vaccine. In the same way you were told these vaccines were 'safe and effective' but they then admitted that they were causing severe adverse effects, like death.

I'm actually so confident in what I'm saying I would suggest you keep getting boosters and you see what happens next. Nothing will happen to you... honest, because the paid Government scientist on the TV told me so...

Yet where is the evidence you claim proves there was a pandemic. You don't seem to grasp irony do you?

Honestly, please have a look at Occam's Razor because that will help you look past your own nonsense.

"We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic. (WHO, 2020).

World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

That was actualy what I was hoping you would do. The WHO is a a private corporation. They are funded primarily by the United States and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They actually changed the definition of a pandemic in 2009:

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/health/09docs.html

With the purpose of shutting the world down in 2020 to force people into taking these poisoned vaccines. In fact when they tried to interfere with the sovereignty of the USA in 2020 Trump defunded them which was the right decision to make.

The same people who funded the pandemic response are the same people who told you there was a pandemic.

Occam's Razor. There was never a pandemic, they lied to force you into taking their clot shot. Honestly, have a look at Occam's Razor, you don't seem to understand how it works because you have run away from my previous response:

Yet where is the evidence you claim proves there was a pandemic. You don't seem to grasp irony do you?

"You don't seem to understand the difference between precisely following a mandate for social safety and the foundational science used to craft the mandate. "

You seem to be creating a series of safety barriers so you don't have to explain what you see through observation. The question is why would those who 'crafted' a mandate for 'social safety' didn't follow that mandate themselves.

"Failure to precisely follow the details of the mandate are not a valid claim that the party does not believe the science itself"

According to whom? Your now stating your opinion as fact. If its not a valid claim then what is it? A serendipitious coincidence of circumstances?

With the purpose of shutting the world down in 2020 to force people into taking these poisoned vaccines. In fact when they tried to interfere with the sovereignty of the USA in 2020 Trump defunded them which was the right decision to make.

The same people who funded the pandemic response are the same people who told you there was a pandemic.

I feel like when you've stooped to the level of trying to explain the basics of human behavior to someone who refuses to get it, maybe you've reached the point where the conversation has ceased to be productive.