By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Renamed said:

"We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic. (WHO, 2020).

World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

That was actualy what I was hoping you would do. The WHO is a a private corporation. They are funded primarily by the United States and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They actually changed the definition of a pandemic in 2009:

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/health/09docs.html

With the purpose of shutting the world down in 2020 to force people into taking these poisoned vaccines. In fact when they tried to interfere with the sovereignty of the USA in 2020 Trump defunded them which was the right decision to make.

The same people who funded the pandemic response are the same people who told you there was a pandemic.

Occam's Razor. There was never a pandemic, they lied to force you into taking their clot shot. Honestly, have a look at Occam's Razor, you don't seem to understand how it works because you have run away from my previous response:

Yet where is the evidence you claim proves there was a pandemic. You don't seem to grasp irony do you?

"You don't seem to understand the difference between precisely following a mandate for social safety and the foundational science used to craft the mandate. "

You seem to be creating a series of safety barriers so you don't have to explain what you see through observation. The question is why would those who 'crafted' a mandate for 'social safety' didn't follow that mandate themselves.

"Failure to precisely follow the details of the mandate are not a valid claim that the party does not believe the science itself"

According to whom? Your now stating your opinion as fact. If its not a valid claim then what is it? A serendipitious coincidence of circumstances?