Yeah because iPhones magically are getting to max out at the current level they're at, lol. This is the worst the iPhone will perform at, it will get progressively better and better every year because iPhones get better hardware every year, iPads frankly already are at the place where they can run modern era ("PS5 class games" if you need that dumbed down to understand) games now if a developer wants to put in the effort of a port, but that will get better too, M3 is already out, M4 will be coming out soon, M5 chips, M6 after that, it will never stop. 

IPhones will get better.  There will also be a ps5 pro and a ps6.... the gap will remain for those who want high fidelity.  

Mobile comes with sacrifices.  In the case of the iPhone, massive sacrifices.

I don't think PS5 Pro is going to have explosive sales aside from early adopters. It's going to be probably $600, more likely $700? Enthusiast market is not as big as people think it is and if you're spending that kind of money you might as well just buy a PC. Like the PS4, the Pro model is not going to sell anywhere close to the main model. 

Faster upgrading product that aren't married to a 7-8 year product cycle in the long run (like PC GPUs, and yes even iPhones and iPads) have a big advantage in that they're upgraded every year pretty much. There's going to be no game in all likelihood that the current Apple M3 chip can't run and that chip already exists, the baseline is stuck at XBox Series S and budget PC cards for most 3rd party games and will be for many more years, a PS5 Pro doesn't change that either. 

The most common GPU on Steam is a Nvidia 3060, followed by a GTX 1650. 

The latest Switch 2 leak is concerning to say the least, I really hope it is bogus. I see 3 main mistakes in the leaked specs:

1. Only 8 GB of RAM. Devs are already frequently complaining that 10 GB (8 useable by devs) on Series S is not enough, so if Nintendo only has 8 GB (6 useable) it definitely feels like many 3rd parties won't want to port their games to Switch 2, just like Switch 1 before it. Imo they need 12 GB of RAM (10 useable by devs).

2. 64 GB of internal storage. Games continue to get bigger and bigger, with some games like CoD now regularly over 100 GB, and the upcoming GTA 6 likely shaping up to be 200 GB+. How in the heck will Switch 2 get ports of these games with such low internal storage? Xbox for instance already committed to putting CoD on Switch 2, but how in the heck will they manage to get a 100 GB+ game to fit on Switch 2? Physical carts only, no digital download? Solid state storage is fairly cheap now, you can get a 500 GB PCIe 3.0 SSD at retail for like $35 now, and Nintendo is buying wholesale, not retail. Why not go big on storage and embrace digital sales where the profit margin for Nintendo is much higher than on physical sales where they waste alot of money on pricey carts?

3. 120hz screen. This just seems pointless. Very few games will be capable of running over 60 fps in handheld mode (ports of older generation games and low graphics indies at most), so why spend money on a higher refresh rate screen when you can put more money into fixing the above RAM and storage problems instead?

Storage is my biggest question for the switch 2.  Modern games are easily pushing 100 gb and require fast read speeds.  Cartridges are too expensive for third party to support with said requirements (capacity and speed).  Internally is going to be a tough option because M2 is expensive and gets hot. 

I really don't know how Nintendo will handle this.  I could see storage being an issue for third party developers.  

I guess it will be better than the Game Boy.

That's true, but my answer was moreso in response to the people who keep unrealistically comparing Switch specs to home consoles, which on the internet seems to be a large majority of people unfortunately even though it's clear that the Switch isn't aiming to compete with home consoles in graphics and is supposed to be appealing as a hybrid device that can play games on the TV and on the go. Those people need to accept the fact that it's pretty much guaranteed Nintendo will ever be close to home consoles in performance with the Switch formula and with Nintendo wanting to keep the price down.

Also, even though the Switch was a powerful portable device in 2017, Nintendo still had the option to make the Switch even more powerful during development, possibly using the Tegra X2 instead of the X1, but opted out on using it cause they wanted to achieve a better balance when it came to the Switch's capabilities when it came to battery life, features, and price. So even as powerful as the Switch was as a handheld Nintendo still has shown they'd reject more powerful hardware in favor of other stuff.

So much cheaper than an iPhone 15 Pro or Pro Max with just a few AAA games.

• iPhone 15 Pro: £/$999 / €1149 (128GB) up to £/$1499 / €1829 (1TB)
• iPhone 15 Pro Max: £/$1199 / €1449 (256GB) up to £/$1599 / €1949 (1TB)

12 GB RAM could happen. Steam Deck is obviously a lot weaker than the 9th gen consoles but has 16 GB RAM. I really don't see Nintendo using that much. Nintendo will probably use 8 or 10, but 12 like you said would be awesome. 

64 GB storage is indeed very paltry. Let's look at some file sizes.

Switch is closer to an Xbox 360 and PS3 in specs than an Xbox One and PS4, but is still clearly above those old consoles.

Uncharted 3 on PS3 is about 43.5 GB. I don't know of any Nintendo games on Switch with that high of a file size, but there are some that are 17 GB and up with updates and DLC. And of course, NBA 2K24 is 61.7 GB. With that in mind Switch having 32 GB (64 GB for OLED) of storage is still small, but not the craziest thing for a hybrid.

Now let's look at Xbox One and PS4, which Switch 2 will be more in line with. COD Modern Warfare is 175 GB+, and I'm sure some third-party games on Switch 2 might be around that. There will probably be a good number of Nintendo games that push 20 GB, some might even go above 40 GB.

128 GB seems like the minimum amount of storage for Switch 2, with 200-256 GB as more ideal. 

120hz on a small screen seems like an unneeded expense for Nintendo. I can picture virtually no games in handheld or docked running 120hz on Switch 2 (PS4 and Xbox One can't run 120hz). I'd take a 1080p screen on Switch 2 over 120hz. The resolution might still be 720p, though. Or maybe 800p (Steam Deck) or 900p.