Mnementh said:
Kyuu said:
SteamDeck is objectively a much better system than Switch in a number of significant areas that include overall game library, and there is nothing wrong in discussing this. Just as there is nothing wrong in saying Switch's exclusive library is leagues and bounds better than SteamDeck's (which technically has no exclusives, but even PC's exclusives pale in comparison to Nintendo's. Its the multiplats where PC and consoles crush Switch). You can even go ahead and compare Switch to Vita if you want, but that would be a boring comparison because everyone and their grandmas know that the Switch, from an objective perspective, is a vastly superior platform. Switch vs SteamDeck is more interesting and more up to date.
|
Actually no, and that is what I argue the whole time. First of all, putting 'objectively' and 'better' in one sentence does not make sense, because 'better' is always a question of 'for who' or 'for which use'. People play games, not technical spec sheets, therefore the technical specs while they might be interesting are not relevant. 'Better' means more value for that person and use. For instance: the fastest car is not always better than a slower car for people. Other considerations like practicality and comfort are much more relevant. To make it painful obvious: a formula 1 racecar is faster than any street car, but it holds no value for private users in daily life.
Nintendo didn't fool people to reach these sales with the Switch, the system has actually value for a lot of gamers. It also isn't down to brand-power or legacy, how much that does we saw with the WiiU. The value as gaming system stems from other things. Switch is both used as a home console and a mobile device. As it does both and seamlessly at that, that already has value. With Switch I can actually keep gaming while arriving at home with the same game. Steam Deck is only one, except I fumble around with additional cables.
But the more interesting part is on the mobile side. Steam Deck only supports mobile. And yet people that say they prefer Steam Deck over Switch usually don't own either, as they are dislike handheld gaming from the get go. So let's consider value for actual handheld gamers. People tend to have different tastes, but there are usually points they tend to gravitate towards. We can expect a bell curve going out from a sweet spot in values, with the most people liking stuff at this sweet spot and less and less people liking it as we move further away. People also are willing to accept a little deviation from their personal preferences, but usually choose something that is closer to their tastes.
If we look at size and weight, then the 3DS must have been hitting that sweet spot or being pretty close. It did had a lot of different models, which were different in size, so the sweet spot must have been somewhere in there, considering it's sales. If we also take the DS into account, it had similar (or somewhat smaller) model sizes to at least a few 3DS models. Switch moves away in one direction. The two models (or three with OLED) it does have are not much of a difference and both are bigger than any 3DS model, it is clear they are already away from that sweet spot for handheld gamers. But there is no current gen alternative, that is smaller, so handheld gamers are willing to take that or have to give up on current gen gaming altogether. The Steam Deck is even further away in size. While there may be gamers who prefer this form factor, they are at the outer end of the bell curve and therefore only few. Everyone closer to the sweet spot may find not an ideal form factor in Switch, but a better one than Steam Deck.
So yes, Steam Deck may be better for a few persons, but in the demographic actually willing to purchase a handheld gaming system, the Switch holds more value for much more people. So for them 'objectively' the Switch is better.
Now, there are always people mixing up specs with value. At all times some people declare: The Turbo-Grafx is better than the SNES! The N64 is better than the PS1! The Xbox is better than a PS2! The Vita is better than a 3DS! And they all seem again and again and again surprised, that specs don't actually equate to value for the majority of people, the same as the majority don't use a racecar to drive to work.
|