People really need to Google the definition of "hot take" before participating in this thread.


People really need to Google the definition of "hot take" before participating in this thread.
| Runa216 said: I gotta say, it's very hard to not argue with everyone who likes a certain game I hate. but this thread is about positivity, not arguments, so I hold my tongue! Except this post, where I show you all how amazingly awesome and mature I am by not countering people's posts I disagree with :P |
![]()
Ubisoft is not nearly as bad as people would make you believe. They make decent games. And their microtransaction implement, while annoying, never gone too far, or ruined the whole experience for me.
TruckOSaurus said:
Funnier? I didn't laugh much playing either Joel or Ellie. |
That's fair. You can use "more engaging" if you please
| Astral said: Ubisoft is not nearly as bad as people would make you believe. They make decent games. And their microtransaction implement, while annoying, never gone too far, or ruined the whole experience for me. |
I didn't even know their games (namely: Assassin's Creed) even had Microtransactions until I was seeking out Valhalla as a Ps5 launch game. Shows how (not) intrusive they were.
My Console Library:
PS5, Switch, XSX
PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360
3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android
mZuzek said:
"More fun" is what you'd use in this scenario. Kinda dumb how fun and funny mean different things, but well, it's english. |
Ok, but what is the comparative for "fun"? Funner (without the "i") ?
Funner isn't a word. More fun/enjoyable is probably what you should use.
Saying something is funnier would imply that what/who you are describing is more funny. Not to be confused with fun (on its own), if that makes sense xP


Saturn is the second-best console of its generation by a large margin. A vast library and varied across genres. Fighting games. Platformers. Shooters. RPGs. Puzzle games. Sims. Saturn has it. Only PS1 had more.



Games that take risks on design, worldbulding, mechanics or story should have more appreciation. It's better to have a sequel that commits to strong changes in the experience than a sequel that looks exactly the same game with better graphics (if at all)
Edit: I haven't that in mind when typing this, but TLDR version is FF is much better than DQ :p
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
