By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Super Mario 3D All-Stars monstrous performance on amazon.com and it's already overtaken TLOU2 2020 total sales.

GoOnKid on 05 September 2020

I am not a fan of remasters. I only buy them if I don't already own the original game. For this reason I don't own a single re-release or remaster of any Wii U game on the Switch, be it Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Hyrule Warriors DE, Xenoblade Chronicles DE, Bayonetta 2, TW101, you name it.

I respect everybody who wants to have this collection even if they already own the originals, though. To each their own. I won't buy this collection because I already own 64 and Sunshine. Generous as I am I am leaving one copy for one of you guys to buy.

I still think it's a great value and the price is fair. Yes, I said it.



Around the Network
Signalstar on 05 September 2020

Ironically I think the last game that I bought new on Day 1 was Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy. Yes, I agree that Crash was a much better package and Activision did a wonderful job updating those games and offering them at a reasonable price. I love the original three Crash games more than I care for Super Mario 64. Super Mario Galaxy is one of the best games ever though along with Galaxy 2. I have yet to play Sunshine.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.

Leynos on 05 September 2020

Scalpers



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

BlackBeauty on 05 September 2020
IcaroRibeiro said:
What I'm really curious to see is the critical reception

Because they trashed Insane trilogy for not having many gameplay improvements

But for the Scam trilogy I'm waiting nothing less than 90+ on Metacritic for straight ports

How do you improve Mario 64 gameplay Lol. Do y’all listen to yo self before posting? People would be angry if they dare to change ANYTHING. 

Crash and Spyro were shite game before the remaster. The remaster actually made them worse gameplay wise esp the hitboxes.

Mario 64 and Galaxy are some of the best designed games of all time. Literally in school, in literature, in books, in design class. Crash and Spyro are NOT..hunny in the same league in the same stratosphere.



IcaroRibeiro on 05 September 2020
BlackBeauty said:

Crash and Spyro were shite game before the remaster. The remaster actually made them worse gameplay wise esp the hitboxes.

Mario 64 and Galaxy are some of the best designed games of all time. Literally in school, in literature, in books, in design class. Crash and Spyro are NOT..hunny in the same league in the same stratosphere.

If you say so who I am to disagree 



Around the Network
errorpwns on 05 September 2020
DonFerrari said:
javi741 said:

Nintendo games to many people are so much better and iconic that people are willing to spend 60$ on them. While the Crash Trilogy definitely had more effort put into it, I think most people could agree even the base versions of Mario 64, Mario Sunshine, and Mario Galaxy are better games.

Which basically just agrees with my point.

And have been many times like that in VGC. Nintendo fanbase have been the most critical of several practices other companies done but praised like crazy when Nintendo done the same. Like locking DLC on Amibos, that was something worse than any other company ever done, still was defended and praised here.

rapsuperstar31 said:

Funny enough if the the Crash of Spyro games would have been $60 USA everyone would have screamed this was unacceptable.  But its Nintendo and we (most) will always let Nintendo slide with it.  The game the way it is, should be $39.99...but I love Nintendo and I love all 3 of these games, and would probably give it a 10 unless something is really wrong with the controls especially using the pro controller. 

And that is just what I was pointing

Your point was they complained there weren't gameplay improvements. For what those games are they don't really need improvements. Mario 64 is still played by a ton today. Just because by your standards it didn't age well doesn't mean it isn't widely played and enjoyed by tons of people. Sunshine and Galaxy also were.

The crash trilogy wasn't as popular not as good to begin with. So of course if you remake it with just better graphics when the graphics weren't the main issue of concern in the first reviews it'll still review not as well as mario games.

Also Sunshine and Galaxy are still visually impressive today when emulated and hold up without any mods or major changes.



Naum on 05 September 2020
Qwark said:
And people say lazy work doesn't get rewarded. They didn't even bother to make super mario 64 in widescreen.

umm they did.. did you not watch the video?



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

DonFerrari on 05 September 2020
errorpwns said:
DonFerrari said:

Which basically just agrees with my point.

And have been many times like that in VGC. Nintendo fanbase have been the most critical of several practices other companies done but praised like crazy when Nintendo done the same. Like locking DLC on Amibos, that was something worse than any other company ever done, still was defended and praised here.

And that is just what I was pointing

Your point was they complained there weren't gameplay improvements. For what those games are they don't really need improvements. Mario 64 is still played by a ton today. Just because by your standards it didn't age well doesn't mean it isn't widely played and enjoyed by tons of people. Sunshine and Galaxy also were.

The crash trilogy wasn't as popular not as good to begin with. So of course if you remake it with just better graphics when the graphics weren't the main issue of concern in the first reviews it'll still review not as well as mario games.

Also Sunshine and Galaxy are still visually impressive today when emulated and hold up without any mods or major changes.

Nope didn't say gameplay. I said the ports had barely been improved.

Crash was very popular and considered good, but sure rewrite story if you want.

Nope they aren't visually impressive. But more power to you if you are satisfied with it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

IcaroRibeiro on 05 September 2020
errorpwns said:
DonFerrari said:

Which basically just agrees with my point.

And have been many times like that in VGC. Nintendo fanbase have been the most critical of several practices other companies done but praised like crazy when Nintendo done the same. Like locking DLC on Amibos, that was something worse than any other company ever done, still was defended and praised here.

And that is just what I was pointing

Your point was they complained there weren't gameplay improvements. For what those games are they don't really need improvements. Mario 64 is still played by a ton today. Just because by your standards it didn't age well doesn't mean it isn't widely played and enjoyed by tons of people. Sunshine and Galaxy also were.

The crash trilogy wasn't as popular not as good to begin with. So of course if you remake it with just better graphics when the graphics weren't the main issue of concern in the first reviews it'll still review not as well as mario games.

Also Sunshine and Galaxy are still visually impressive today when emulated and hold up without any mods or major changes.

Crash gameplay was never an issue either 

Most critics praised it actually 

The critics now state it didn't aged too well and needed some improvements, what I for sure agree or at least accept as a legit reason to give it a 6/10 or 7/10

What I find amusing is how lenient are critics when it comes to review Nintendo "classic" games 

A critic won't be intellectually honest to state a 24 years old game don't need any graphic or gameplay improvements and is as good and enjoyable as it was in 1996, not when the same critic point this as a negative aspect in another review just because it's  from a a far less acclamied franchise 

Of course, scores for this trilogy aren't out yet, so I can be wrong and critics can be intellectually honest this time, I just doubt it. It will score 90+ again like anything with Super Mario in the title 



kirby007 on 05 September 2020
DonFerrari said:
errorpwns said:

Your point was they complained there weren't gameplay improvements. For what those games are they don't really need improvements. Mario 64 is still played by a ton today. Just because by your standards it didn't age well doesn't mean it isn't widely played and enjoyed by tons of people. Sunshine and Galaxy also were.

The crash trilogy wasn't as popular not as good to begin with. So of course if you remake it with just better graphics when the graphics weren't the main issue of concern in the first reviews it'll still review not as well as mario games.

Also Sunshine and Galaxy are still visually impressive today when emulated and hold up without any mods or major changes.

Nope didn't say gameplay. I said the ports had barely been improved.

Crash was very popular and considered good, but sure rewrite story if you want.

Nope they aren't visually impressive. But more power to you if you are satisfied with it.

why do you represent only the technical aspect of visually?



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.