By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
errorpwns on 05 September 2020
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
javi741 said:

Nintendo games to many people are so much better and iconic that people are willing to spend 60$ on them. While the Crash Trilogy definitely had more effort put into it, I think most people could agree even the base versions of Mario 64, Mario Sunshine, and Mario Galaxy are better games.

Which basically just agrees with my point.

And have been many times like that in VGC. Nintendo fanbase have been the most critical of several practices other companies done but praised like crazy when Nintendo done the same. Like locking DLC on Amibos, that was something worse than any other company ever done, still was defended and praised here.

rapsuperstar31 said:

Funny enough if the the Crash of Spyro games would have been $60 USA everyone would have screamed this was unacceptable.  But its Nintendo and we (most) will always let Nintendo slide with it.  The game the way it is, should be $39.99...but I love Nintendo and I love all 3 of these games, and would probably give it a 10 unless something is really wrong with the controls especially using the pro controller. 

And that is just what I was pointing

Your point was they complained there weren't gameplay improvements. For what those games are they don't really need improvements. Mario 64 is still played by a ton today. Just because by your standards it didn't age well doesn't mean it isn't widely played and enjoyed by tons of people. Sunshine and Galaxy also were.

The crash trilogy wasn't as popular not as good to begin with. So of course if you remake it with just better graphics when the graphics weren't the main issue of concern in the first reviews it'll still review not as well as mario games.

Also Sunshine and Galaxy are still visually impressive today when emulated and hold up without any mods or major changes.