I mean, if you don't want to do the work to have an informed opinion, that is entirely on you, however it should be understood by everyone involved that what you are saying is merely an uninformed opinion and, again, not an accurate reflection of scientific consensus. To that effect, I'm not really sure why it matters what others in this thread are doing. Just because some people in this thread may not be making the best arguments, that doesn't mean that there is any issue with the science...
Lastly, why do you think fringe opinions invalidate scientific consensus?
I'm just sharing equal predictions of the past the didn't happened.
The same way this thread piece of news will most likely not happen.
All the scientists that published things that didn't happen were never corrected or criticised. But their piece of news created uninformed threads like this.
So all the climatologists, meteorologists, biologists, zoologists, chemists, geologists, physicists, glaciologists, atmospheric dynamacists, oceanographers, paleontologists, ecologists, biochemists, mathematicians, etc...from nearly 200 countries (some at war with each other) around the world that study and confer agreement based on their own independent, respective fields are all in on some grand hoax?
International Team of specialists find no end in sight to 30-year cooling trend in northern hemisphere
Now, don't argue with me. Please, pick up the phone and give a call the International Team of Specialists. Can you do that?
God bless You.
When PS4 will hit 100m consoles sold: Before Christmas 2019
There were three ravens sat on a tree / They were as blacke as they might be / The one of them said to his mate, Where shall we our breakfast take?