Amazing how some still try to defend EA's shenanigans.

EA has never played in the success or failure of a Nintendo system. Just as an example. EA support was gone on Wii U after launch. They also supported Gamecube pretty decently. They also only put 1 or 2 madden games on DS, other than that EA only put out shovelware. No one has ever said Boogie and My Sims Racing was a factor in DS sales.
EA supported PS Vita better than 3DS.

That said EA is missing an opportunity to have portable Dead Space, Mirrors Edge, Mass Effect. I do think those would sell.

I totally agree that they are either unable to understand how to profit (on their expectations) on Nintendo HW or that they understand what they need and don't want to do that (that it could lead to less total profit/investment). That isn't a defense of EA or their practices, but to deny that there isn't much room for 3rd party compared to 1st parties on Switch is also undeniable (and not a problem for me, even on PS4 I buy much more 1st party than 3rd party even though there is like 100x more titles from 3rd parties and most of the top sellers there aren't Sony).

And yes I do think most Nintendo titles are better than most 3rd party games.

Honest question. Why do people care so much? It's not like you're missing much. Respawn is the only devs from that side that seem to kinda know how to make decent games anyway. What games from EA would you want?

This is still a misrepresentation. 3rd-parties as a whole have a lower share on Nintendo platforms, because

1. best-selling 3rd-party titles do not release on Nintendo-platforms, including Switch
2. Nintendo titles do better than Sony/MS-titles

But that doesn't mean much in the bigger picture. Because for a game dev the question is: will my game sell on Switch. And for most games that released on Switch and also on other platforms the answer is: yes, it sells and often sells better than on other platforms. For that answer it doesn't matter that a non-existing RDR doesn't sell on Switch, or that a Mario Kart sells 20 million (in the same way as the same dev doesn't care that on PS4 RDR2 sells 20 million). I mean, the argument could easily be: most game devs have no space on PS4, as most of it's game sales are dedicated to Call of Duty, GTA and Red Dead Redemption. But in actuality that doesn't matter so much, except you try to directly compete with these titles.

And well, on Switch even titles that directly compete with Mario Kart do pretty well. For instance Crash Team Racing did not worse on Switch than on Xbox One, despite Xbox not having Mario Kart. Team Sonic Racing apparently sold similar on Switch and PS4, but again PS4 has no Mario Kart.

So the existance of great selling Nintendo titles is actually not of importance, important is how much your game sells. That can be answered differently for different games, but I am pretty sure of EA's catalogue, the Sims would do pretty well on Switch. Probably also Dragon Age and Mass Effect, but I am pretty sure about the Sims. FIFA and Battlefield on the other hand probably will not find as much customers on Switch.

Black&White, Command&Conquer, Dragon Age, Dungeon Keeper, Plants vs. Zombies, Theme Park, Ultima, to name a few. EA actually has a broad range of great IPs. And only remastering one of the older titles of these series would not break the bank, but probably bring in decent sales.

Ok, but from what I've seen they kinda been ruining those IPs anyway. (especially Dungeon Keeper) but yes they could put more stuff on Switch and not hurt the bank, but they are barely putting those games on systems they do support.

Pretty much.

You are basically using absence of evidence as evidence of absence.

The pubs release what they believe will make good profit (thus why you have somewhat split number of titles that sell better versus PS4 and vice-versa), but the games that sell 20M on PS4 wouldn't be release on Switch and if they were they wouldn't probably cross 5M.

The list of releases on Switch barely have any 3rd party crossing 2M.

Actually, I present the games, that are actually there as evidence, that 3rd-party games sell. EA is actually using the absence of evidence as their main argument. You do with your closing statement, because not much of the games that released on Switch have sold more than 2M on other platforms, and those who are are mostly late ports (Skyrim) or seriously diminished versions (FIFA Legacy). I instead argue with games that are actually released on Switch, and that do as well or even better than their releases on other platforms.

Yeah, I know they don't do much with these IPs, but you asked which stuff we care about. And it would be easy for EA. Look at Capcom and Square, who actively looking through their basement which old titles they could release next. I mean, I knew Capcom recycles Resident Evil as much as possible, but Dragons Dogma was a surprise, and I am happy about it. Similar with all the old Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest titles. Back in the day I played on PC, so I missed these, so I am actually happy about these ports. EA could so easily do the same and release a port of Dragon Age or a remaster of Dungeon Keeper, and many people would happily buy that.