In addition to these 25, the 30 OG games are all enhanced as well.

With speculation that Scarlet will launch around 2020, Next Gen may very well be what's coming after Navi.

Is it me or the less powerful Xbox console will just hold back the graphical quality of the exclusives that will be on both consoles? Just like the Xbox One does to the Xbox One X.

True, but while not proven, is PS working with AMD on the overall Navi arch and is that part of the reason for it's delay? Maybe, maybe not. If PS knows MS has decided to use that Next Gen arch, then it would make sense to try and take more time to bake some of that into Navi, like they did with Polaris and Vega in the Pro. Next Gen from AMD is supposed to be a leap passed GCN. Navi is supposed to be either another improvement on GCN beyond Vega, or somewhat of a hybrid between GCN and Next Gen. If Scarlet is using the Next Gen arch, then yes, it should be another similar situation to Pro and XB1X in terms of launch, specs, and price. 

You're going to have 4 different SKUs, mostly likely with 4 different prices, with a bunch of writing (a mixture of 2 or more of these, "No Disc Drive" "Disc Games Do Not Work" "Streaming/Download Only" "Disc Drive Included" "Disk Games Work" "1080p Only" "4K Gaming") on the front of the box so as not to mislead consumers.  Then next to it you have the nice and simple all in one solution that is the PS5, just a picture of the console with minimal writing.  Which do you honestly think the average consumer is most likely to choose?

We'll have to wait and see exactly what "next-gen" actually means.  As for the leak, apparently it was multiple sources in AMD.  They say that was the reason that Raja Koduri, the person in charge of Vega development, left.  AMD was focusing more on making Navi with/for Sony, than the Vega line.  Which, if true, makes sense for AMD to do, frankly.  The PS4 is going to sell 100M+, which means 100M+ APUs sold for AMD.  PS5 is likely to repeat that success.

At the start of this generation, consumers chose the console with the lowest price point.  Gamers have proven time and time again to be very price-sensitive when it comes to hardware purchases.  So, if one of these Xbox devices is cheaper than the lowest cost PlayStation 5, that will certainly go a long way to driving Xbox sales.  

Of course, Sony knows this.  So, they very well may do something similar.  

wrong post, beginner here 

I am not talking about the flops, i am talking about comparison to make it easy to compare so i wouldn't have to explain between console generation.  To be called premium like Xbox One X , Anaconda should have the power 5 to 6 times Lockhart. 

Oh I get it now. But still skeptical about the next end-gen games performance.

Depends on the game. I haven't had to much drama though.
Xbox One backwards compatibility isn't always flawless either, even less so on the OG Xbox One. - I.E. When Halo: Reach was first made backwards compatible it was almost unplayable.

Don't get me wrong, anything is better than than nothing. (Sony/Nintendo's attempts thus far.)

And the fact that the Xbox One X has been on the market for over a year now. Anyone hoping it would have a ton of backwards compatible games that are enhanced... Is probably disappointed.

I am hoping that the Next-Gen consoles are using AMD's next-gen GPU architecture... Because from a PC perspective it's all the same graphics generation.

Navi is just an evolutionary update to the same GPU found in the Xbox One launched in 2013 and PC GPU's from 2012, granted lots have changed since those days even for AMD's GPU's, but allot has also stayed the same.

AMD's design of it's Next-Gen architecture shouldn't be far from being finished at this point. Navi is likely done.
GPU designs take years to think about, design and manufacture... So hopefully Microsoft/Sony can leverage that and use a design that is a little more forward thinking. (Like the Xbox 360 did.)

Sony is working with AMD's custom-design division, not with AMD's GPU design division.
Navi is just an iterative update to Graphics Core Next, the same overall design as the base Xbox One, not a new ground-up design.

Provided that is even possible. Remember, Graphics Core Next is a modular design, so AMD can update one part of the GPU and leave the rest identical.
Vega and Polaris are still very much Graphics Core Next, so Sony and Microsoft could leverage the new blocks whilst keeping the rest of the hardware identical, which is fantastic for time-to-market and cost control.

We don't have any idea what approach they will be taking with their Next-Gen GPU architecture.

Again. Performance has no correspondence to a console generation or if it's a premium device.

Apple markets it's devices as premium... And yet is often beaten by Android alternatives in many aspects relating to it's hardware. (I.E. Ram and Displays)

What makes a premium device is a device that hasn't had corners cut... What makes the Xbox One X a premium device isn't it's performance (As it's only PC mid-range/low-end anyway) but because of the overall design, the fact it's using Vapor-Chamber cooling, it has a slim profile, it runs fairly quietly and has a stupidly efficient power supply/delivery system.

Personally, I don't believe AMD has any next-gen level of GPU hardware on the market yet, I will wait and see what Navi and Next Gen brings though.