By anything I mean the fact that 1st party holds more weight than 3rd party, thus directs are rated mostly by the 1st party showings. How you extrapolated that into me not caring about 3rd partys again I'll never know, but I'm not even gonna word my response any differently, just gonna straight up copy-paste.
The rest of the post would hold relevance if you thought it would be relevant to your argument, is what you mean.I mean, you say the rest of my post is irrelevant, but then you say this: "...which I didn't, but even that still wouldn't change anything.".In another words, you dont care about them, the third party games that was revealed, because in your opinion they are irrelevant to you and by extention, to the userbase of the Switch, no matter how good they are or more importantly, how well they sell.Because that surely shows zero interest for these games on the Switch and there would be no excitment over them.Gotcha.
Well, glad that we got that cleared out.With this we can easily conclude that yes, without the leaks the presentation would have been better.
"No one ever said anything about Fortnite not being a good get, speaking of putting words in people's mouths. However it is undeniable that Nintendo systems are bought primarily for Nintendo games, so naturally the 3rd party stuff doesn't hold as much weight as 1st party to most people. That's not me saying everyone is me lol, that's just going by sales data and from actually listening to those who were disappointed in the direct."
Also I never disagreed with the direct being better without leaks, only that it would make a difference to how it's perceived, but again this a moot point.
I didnt extrapolate anything, Im just pointing out that you are dismissing the third party games shown there as mostly inconsequential, shown by your lack of interest in them with frases as "Even if the games hadnt leaked, it would make the direct 0.2% better" or the non acknoledgement of its success found with the consoles through its sales numbers and such.So it seems you are misunderstanding me once again, so let me rephrase:
Nintendo games usually do the heavily lifting of the consoles sales, and its not much different with the Switch.However, in a matter that is usually uncharacteristic to Nintendo hardware, 3rd party games are generally selling extremelly well on the Switch, and all of them are not shovelware.So it stands to reason that a considerable number of Switch owners and thus, people watching the Nintendo presentation, wouldd have been more thrilled with the presentation itself if such games as DB Fighters Z, Fortnite and Overcooked 2 werent leaked ahead of the presentation.For an example of such an "adoption" of one of these games is Fortnite, which was downloaded over 2 million times in a single day.Yes, its a free to play game, but people wont download anything unless they are interested.
In conclusion, what I mean to say is that all your talk about third parties being mostly irrelevant compared to Nintendo games being shown and that the show would be 0.2% better if those same games hadnt been leaked is complete BS, especially because you are looking at this in a personal way, and Im using data to back up my claims.