Why do we still look forward to Nintendo's E3 directs?

[Lonely_Dolphin]

Nautilus said:

Lonely_Dolphin said:
But nothing, that's all there is to it. The rest of your post would only have relevance if I said third partys held no weight, which I didn't, but even that still wouldn't change anything.

The rest of the post would hold relevance if you thought it would be relevant to your argument, is what you mean.I mean, you say the rest of my post is irrelevant, but then you say this: "...which I didn't, but even that still wouldn't change anything.".In another words, you dont care about them, the third party games that was revealed, because in your opinion they are irrelevant to you and by extention, to the userbase of the Switch, no matter how good they are or more importantly, how well they sell.Because that surely shows zero interest for these games on the Switch and there would be no excitment over them.Gotcha.

Well, glad that we got that cleared out.With this we can easily conclude that yes, without the leaks the presentation would have been better.

By anything I mean the fact that 1st party holds more weight than 3rd party, thus directs are rated mostly by the 1st party showings. How you extrapolated that into me not caring about 3rd partys again I'll never know, but I'm not even gonna word my response any differently, just gonna straight up copy-paste.

"No one ever said anything about Fortnite not being a good get, speaking of putting words in people's mouths. However it is undeniable that Nintendo systems are bought primarily for Nintendo games, so naturally the 3rd party stuff doesn't hold as much weight as 1st party to most people. That's not me saying everyone is me lol, that's just going by sales data and from actually listening to those who were disappointed in the direct."

Also I never disagreed with the direct being better without leaks, only that it would make a difference to how it's perceived, but again this a moot point.