By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

ArchangelMadzz said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope, not talking about Twitter, but the people that are avid to request others to be shut down.

The people that are avid for Twitter to enforce their own rules?

Selectively enforce you mean right?

Because those people probably doesn't request to ban accounts from BLM speak mouth, or Maduro government, etc.

So we do know what some consider to be hate speech is variable to their political alignment.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
ArchangelMadzz said:
o_O.Q said:

people are now conflating speech with violence so he does have a good point

https://www.dailywire.com/news/21128/watch-berkeley-students-chant-speech-violence-frank-camp#exit-modal

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452547/college-students-speech-can-be-violence

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-chilling-study-shows-how-hostile-college-students-are-toward-free-speech/2017/09/18/cbb1a234-9ca8-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html?utm_term=.3e6783821017

What? I'm not talking about speech = violence.

I'm talking about he is threatening to incinerate millions of people, that threat of violence. 

And we should also ban Churchill or Eisenhower from Twitter if it existed on WW2 when they were talking about retaliation over Nazi Germany?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Donald Trump is probably the best thing to happen to Twiitter. He gives them daily worldwide exposure. I think Twitter would be starting to fail without him. Because the average person realizes they don't need a Twitter account.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.

If anything his tweets bring up more and more people up against him. Is there a minimum age someone must have to use the service?



If Twitter bans him, then how would he be able to rant about Twitter banning him?



Around the Network
SvennoJ said:
Why not just say, the president is above the law. No need to dance around it.

This



DonFerrari said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

What? I'm not talking about speech = violence.

I'm talking about he is threatening to incinerate millions of people, that threat of violence. 

And we should also ban Churchill or Eisenhower from Twitter if it existed on WW2 when they were talking about retaliation over Nazi Germany?

You really think they both would run the twitter accounts the way Trump is? 

DonFerrari said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

The people that are avid for Twitter to enforce their own rules?

Selectively enforce you mean right?

Because those people probably doesn't request to ban accounts from BLM speak mouth, or Maduro government, etc.

So we do know what some consider to be hate speech is variable to their political alignment.

No, I mean enforce. 



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

ArchangelMadzz said:
DonFerrari said:

And we should also ban Churchill or Eisenhower from Twitter if it existed on WW2 when they were talking about retaliation over Nazi Germany?

You really think they both would run the twitter accounts the way Trump is? 

DonFerrari said:

Selectively enforce you mean right?

Because those people probably doesn't request to ban accounts from BLM speak mouth, or Maduro government, etc.

So we do know what some consider to be hate speech is variable to their political alignment.

No, I mean enforce. 

Owww so you have more problems with the way things is said than intentions and actions??? Ok then.

And you may mean enforce, but the groups that are vocal about banning him do also ask to ban BLM and the other examples of hate speech?

Because from what I get on facebook anything that can be interpreted (even reaaching) against black, woman, gay, etc is fastly banned while people doing drug apology, selling pirated games, asking for police to be exterminated, etc are usually answered by facebook as not being against their communities policy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

You really think they both would run the twitter accounts the way Trump is? 

No, I mean enforce. 

Owww so you have more problems with the way things is said than intentions and actions??? Ok then.

And you may mean enforce, but the groups that are vocal about banning him do also ask to ban BLM and the other examples of hate speech?

Because from what I get on facebook anything that can be interpreted (even reaaching) against black, woman, gay, etc is fastly banned while people doing drug apology, selling pirated games, asking for police to be exterminated, etc are usually answered by facebook as not being against their communities policy.

No, you misunderstand and are adding words. where did I say that? 

If you think churchill would use his twitter to threaten violence upon other governments and their people then yes, he should under twitter guidelines be banned from the site. Other government leaders, and previous leaders before trump didn't use their twitters to continue tensions with foreign govnerments.
Why did I even have to explain that?  

And those people are wrong, the guidelines should be enforced on everyone.
Wait do you even use facebook? Because I see that going on everyday with no action. 



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

ArchangelMadzz said:
DonFerrari said:

Owww so you have more problems with the way things is said than intentions and actions??? Ok then.

And you may mean enforce, but the groups that are vocal about banning him do also ask to ban BLM and the other examples of hate speech?

Because from what I get on facebook anything that can be interpreted (even reaaching) against black, woman, gay, etc is fastly banned while people doing drug apology, selling pirated games, asking for police to be exterminated, etc are usually answered by facebook as not being against their communities policy.

No, you misunderstand and are adding words. where did I say that? 

If you think churchill would use his twitter to threaten violence upon other governments and their people then yes, he should under twitter guidelines be banned from the site. Other government leaders, and previous leaders before trump didn't use their twitters to continue tensions with foreign govnerments.
Why did I even have to explain that?  

And those people are wrong, the guidelines should be enforced on everyone.
Wait do you even use facebook? Because I see that going on everyday with no action. 

Errrrrr, Churchill and Eisenhower used radio to do war talk and that basically involved action and killing against other countries... but sure we are the generation that Trump threatening to torch some people is worse than Eisenhower dropping 2 nukes on a country...

Yes I do use facebook and am part of several groups where they monitor a lot of hate speechs done by "liberals" that get answers with not being against the policies but posts that use a specific word or another on subject involving minorities are hammered down...

Perhaps you need to break from your bubble on facebook.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."