I have no issue at all with Twitter not banning Trump but this statement is just way for them to cover their back since they ban people left and right for way less offenses. Very apporiate of them to adress this issue AFTER Trump became president :).
imo it shows what he thinks
DonFerrari said:
That wasn't my first post on this thread. And the "movement speaches" is something about random posters? Nope those are mouthpieces of some progressive movements. |
By initial, I meant the first post I responded to. And I've honestly never heard the term movement speeches, nor does a google or dictionary search yield any relevant usages, so I can't be expected to know what you mean by that.
ArchangelMadzz said:
Way to put a spin on "You can't threaten violence on our platform" |
Governments can legally engage in violence, individuals cant. Different standards, Trump represents a government.
Aeolus451 said:
Like the verified users who say stuff like "kill white people"? |
You should report them.
contestgamer said:
Governments can legally engage in violence, individuals cant. Different standards, Trump represents a government. |
It's his personal twitter account that is threatening violence. Anyway, we're not talking about anything legal, we're talking about a private company and their terms of service.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
ArchangelMadzz said:
Way to put a spin on "You can't threaten violence on our platform" |
Usually limited to ineffectual ALL CAPS abuse...
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Trump is basically keeping Twitter alive at this point.
JWeinCom said:
By initial, I meant the first post I responded to. And I've honestly never heard the term movement speeches, nor does a google or dictionary search yield any relevant usages, so I can't be expected to know what you mean by that. |
Ok for the initial, miss comunication.
You couldn't associate movement speeches with the major representatives of a movement speaking in the name of it? But ok. My bad if I was unprecise.
contestgamer said:
Governments can legally engage in violence, individuals cant. Different standards, Trump represents a government. |
That is indeed and sadly true. Government retain the monopoly over violence. And to the answer gave to you, Trump currently is the maximum representative of the govern, but surely Twitter isn't mandated to keep his account and allow him to break ToS because of it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| Locknuts said: I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Trump is basically keeping Twitter alive at this point. |
Lol, no. There's 19 people that have more followers than him.
Bet with PeH:
I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.
Bet with WagnerPaiva:
I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
