Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

[DonFerrari]

ArchangelMadzz said:

DonFerrari said:

Owww so you have more problems with the way things is said than intentions and actions??? Ok then.

And you may mean enforce, but the groups that are vocal about banning him do also ask to ban BLM and the other examples of hate speech?

Because from what I get on facebook anything that can be interpreted (even reaaching) against black, woman, gay, etc is fastly banned while people doing drug apology, selling pirated games, asking for police to be exterminated, etc are usually answered by facebook as not being against their communities policy.

No, you misunderstand and are adding words. where did I say that? 

If you think churchill would use his twitter to threaten violence upon other governments and their people then yes, he should under twitter guidelines be banned from the site. Other government leaders, and previous leaders before trump didn't use their twitters to continue tensions with foreign govnerments.
Why did I even have to explain that?  

And those people are wrong, the guidelines should be enforced on everyone.
Wait do you even use facebook? Because I see that going on everyday with no action. 

Errrrrr, Churchill and Eisenhower used radio to do war talk and that basically involved action and killing against other countries... but sure we are the generation that Trump threatening to torch some people is worse than Eisenhower dropping 2 nukes on a country...

Yes I do use facebook and am part of several groups where they monitor a lot of hate speechs done by "liberals" that get answers with not being against the policies but posts that use a specific word or another on subject involving minorities are hammered down...

Perhaps you need to break from your bubble on facebook.