This sounds a lot like that evangelion fanfic i read that one time
this smells
Should Wonder Woman be recast if this story is true? | |||
| Yes | 9 | 40.91% | |
| No | 8 | 36.36% | |
| It don't bother me | 5 | 22.73% | |
| Total: | 22 | ||
This sounds a lot like that evangelion fanfic i read that one time
this smells
I would hope that she answers the allegations. It's at the very least, a well wriiten, detailed account, and the accused rapist seems real enough, insofar as it appears his real name was used. Pictures of him are floating around too.
- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."
Thanks for the context OP....
But from NATO's post.. no. No she shouldn't not until something tangible actually can be shown.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
First of all, what's with literally everyone and their mom being accused of sexual assault or some shit this year?
That aside, I just read all that, and my immediate thoughts are....
1. That whole story sounds fake as fuck. It's written like some amateur writer first trying his hand at dramatizing such a scene.
2. In this story, the victim never actually made it clear to Gadot that she had in fact been raped, she simply said "something happened" between her and the guy, so even if all this did happen, it sounds like Gadot simply thought her roommate had slept with her best friend's man. Of course she'd be mad. Just because it's clear to you in your mind what you mean with "something happened," doesn't mean you can expect others to know exactly wtf you mean if afterwards you just stand around and don't open your mouth.
Considering a lot of false claims happen I don't think we have to take action now.
If it indeed is true, then the producers will take her down.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Yeah, I don't think you can prove it this after so many years. The only way would be eye witnesses to bruising, finding that 15 year old that was there before this girl moved in and seeing if key details match up such as dates, locations, addresses, names of individuals.
There needs to be an organisation set up for these cases where people are coming forward with allegations so they can be chased up properly and investigated.
The two cons of doing this this way are:
1) you could be fabricating shit and you'll wreck someone's life
2) people will call you a liar etc and make you feel even worse about the shit you had to go through.
Smells like all the pieces are in place for her to make a few minor adjustments to the story ("I've never been drunk like that ever again" suspiciously sounds like a load of shit). However, even if you assume she was only drunk and not drugged, she was inebriated and still said no. It feels like she's embellishing unnecessarily.
If true, though, WW should definitely be recast. Wonder Woman is a feminist icon, and feminist icons can't be rape apologists. Most other characters I would say whatever, but Wonder Woman is specifically important in that she can never be associated with that kind of negative behavior towards women.
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames
Wonder Woman should be re-cast either way.
It's baffling how this movie is praised as the savior to make up for all the recent bad comic adaptions.
Hunting Season is done...
This entire story makes sense in a certain context which I won't mention since i'll probably get banned.
No, there isn't any journalistic weight behind the story as of yet. The first website that posted (Medium), did so without attempting to protect the identity of anyone in it (including other proported victims) or any attempt to validate the timeline and connections.
These portions ring alarm bells for me when you connect:
"I didn’t have the language to call this rape. Rape was something to fear from strangers while walking alone down the street. Rape was not committed by a friend."
"I told Gal something had happened between Yaniv and I."
"She was furious for Ayala and “what I had done to her”. Gal pointed her finger in my face like a weapon. She asked me how I could do this, and that I needed to make this up to Ayala."
"Yaniv asked if I had ever drank wine, knowing I had not. He bought me several drinks with dinner while telling me that I needed to try different varieties. It’s hard for me to remember what happened after that. I assume he drugged me."
"To this day, I have never been inebriated in that particular way, especially after only drinking wine. I was in and out of consciousness, and my body felt limp. I kept falling over."
My first thought is whether she even told Gaddot she was raped. "something happened between me and X" doesn't equate to rape. I was drunk and can't remember last night doesn't communicate being raped. It feels very much like she concluded in retrospect that she was drugged based on her later experience of alcohol, so I doubt being drugged (if she was- her description is no different from my first time drinking) is something which she would have told Gaddot at the time- This is all just context to Gaddots response, which reads as a friend furious that another girl slept with her close friends BF.
Ultimately I wouldn't be surprised if Gal would have responded in that way and I don't think its its the end of the world. She was 19yo working is extremely tough, sexist industry (in an extremely sexist country) way before modern wave of feminism enabled by social media (we're talking 2003) challenged the way many young people though about gender relations. Thats not to excuse her behaviour but she was 19 then and 32 now, so not the best example of hypocrisy. Its kind of offensive to compare this to what is actually going in Hollywood.