Pyro as Bill said: @Soundwave 1,2 Switch doesn't need the screen, it just acts as a referee. I can't think of any smartphone games that do that. 'Hide the wiimote' on Wii Party is the closest I can think of. Ton of fun. 1,2 Switch has you looking into people's eyes and shit talking. That's what makes local multiplayer so good. No griefers spoiling everybody's game because they're losing. Spammers/cheaters get a punch in the arm if they don't stop. Smartphone games aren't suited to local multiplayer. Have you ever played a local multiplayer smartphone game because I don't think I have outside of taking turns on flappy bird. |
There are lots of charades/party games on iOS that have you getting up in front of friends and flailing your arms about, there's nothing specific to 1,2 Switch that is so unique that it's going to drive a person who doesn't own a video game console today to decide to go pay $350. There's also Just Dance on iOS/Android now.
If it was that easy Wii Party U on the Wii U also would've lit up sales, and Wii Party U honestly is actually a pretty fun party game. Lots of fun.
But there are fun alternatives on the iPad/iPhone/Android that are $350 cheaper.
For Nintendo's version of this "party fun night" to work out the difference in cost, that Joycon needs to be giving out sexual favors.
Nintendo CAN find a new audience, but Nintendo fans need to realize it doesn't need to revolve around grovelling for casuals like a sad guy who's still hoping a girl who dumped him seven years ago will take him back.
The strategy that seems to be working well right now is putting a Nintendo spin/take on popular genres. Splatoon did this (online shooter). Mario Maker did this (game maker/content creator). ARMS seems to be doing it (1-on-1 fighting game). That's the way to go. You can't rely on fickle casuals for anything, they will drop you just as quickly as they embrace you, you can't run a stable business like that.