Well, the "we all know who they are" is typical lingo if you have a weak case, because clearly naming stuff you mean would make it easy to take your argument down. By talking "we all know who", everone assumes someone else and a lot can agree.

It has “a strong Sony bias“ when looking from a point of view of someone with a strong Nintendo bias.

It has “a strong Nintendo bias” when looking from a point of view of someone with a strong Sony bias.

Sucks, but that’s pretty much it.

I think the only bias is against Stadia. Which is good. It allows everyone on the site, except for Barkley, to have at it with the:

- Flaming
- Trolling
- Ill will, ie: Stadia conference interrupted by terrorist attack, sinkhole swallows Google headquarters, comet strikes the Earth ending Stadia and all life ( those were just me).

I look at the banned list often, and everything seems fine to me.

If we're moving on from the previous discussion, I'd like to thank you CGI for actually answering my queries.

Thanks for the transparency, that is appreciated.

As a background: I answered to ClassicGamingWizz's post and this was just the most recent example on my mind, so I linked to that. Also it seemed kinda fitting, as for me it was similarly condescending as could be interpreted for Pyro. But adding the forum has a strong Sony bias was over the line from me, so I have to apologize for this sentence.

It is kinda difficult to recognize from a normal user, if a low-level moderator action like keeping an eye on it happens. For an observer this can look like the same offense is handled differently, as this behind the scenes escalation is invisible. It leaves the impression that comments like these are acceptable. Dunno how this could be resolved.

Replying to each and every report that gets removed from the queue would be a gigantic pain in the arse for moderators. A lot of stuff that gets reported has historically not really been worthy of any action, and unless we have far fewer reports coming in now than previously, it would just be a waste of time for moderators to reply to each report that gets removed.

take a look at the ion fury thread on resetera, saying you would buy the game ended up in getting you banned, thank the lord our mods are a bit more levelheaded

I am not on resetera, why the hell is declaring buying a game ban-worthy?

Oh sweet Jesus yes. I don't spend any time there, but things have been brought to my attention over the years...I was once ( indirectly, among a group ) given direction here on VGC to cease lambasting that site, due to the fact that we have some cross-membership. It's a disgusting cesspool, and an online embodiment of my disillusionment with what some of the left has become. I always thought "I couldn't be more left", until part of being on the side of the "left" became being just as much of a bigot as the worst elements that embody some of the right.

The left used to hold the moral high ground. And they did for a long time. It was something to be proud of. No longer. That's been pissed away. So here's the part where I delete what I want to say, and say I'm deleting what I want to say. Again though, yes. The mods here live up to the meaning of the word "moderator", unlike the petty, small minded tyrants at resetera.

Currently on my 7th IPA.

Yours truly, Tyrone Bibbons, esq.

You guys are very confused. The word "Moderator" in moderator thread refers to our moderators, not the ones on Resetera XD.