I'll probably get multiplats for PS4...
Having said that, I have a 45 hour work week and a two hour commute, plus I travel a lot for work...
I don't always have the time needed to play through a game that demands a lot of time...
I may get multiplats on Switch if they are games I know I will play a lot (if the port isn't terrible)...

I don't even need external HDDs. You can just swap Micro SDs, that's all I need to be happy. I mean, sure, I could also swap the hard drive in the PS4, but that is a little more complicated and also needs more time. 

if this is true I really dont expect to see multiplat games like Mass Effect on the system

I dont think anybody thats not a die hard nintendo fan expext frostbite 3 games on a handheld.

It's not a myth. It's possibly a console-killing issue that needs to be talked about. According to the rumors, the SD card cap is 128GB, not 256GB, and the unit won't support an external hard drive at all. So it's 16GB affordable $60 cartridge standard, 32GB internal, 128GB SD, and ZERO GB external. That is textbook dire right there.

At 50GB per game, that a whopping 2 games, unless a publisher opts for the vastly more expensive 64GB cartridges, Of which the cost would either be passed on to the consumer, or the publisher will literally have to take a loss on every copy sold on the Switch that they wouldn't have to on any other version of the same exact game so they can keep the game at $60. Dire.

And don't even try to bring up 1tb/2tb SD cards when Nintendo already has a cap of 128GB. But let's entertain that for a second. How cheap do you think these things are, exactly? There's a 512GB microSD card out right now. You know how for how much? $310. How long before any currently nonexistent 1TB microSD is even close to the realm of affordability for anyone? Not for years.

The Switch isn't some magical device made to make all of your dreams come true. It's a consumer device that has quite possibly shot itself in the foot and with a serious space problem. No myths, just facts.

First of all, it's not just on the go. I've already said that. It's CoD untethered to your TV. And second of all, of course you can play Cod online on the go. You do it via 4G, which the patents say the Switch allows for and which Iwata specifically spoke about implementing nearly half a decade ago. Something mobile has been doing for years. That answers exactly what's convenient about CoD on the go.

So now we're back to how there is no reason to believe people "definitely" wouldn't buy the Switch version.

Games on optical discs or HDDs can also take use of compression technologies. Flash storage is no different to other storage media.

Using compressed data makes sense for some data, but is a no go for other data, especially on mobile devices with slow CPUs and additional battery drain due to decompression of the files.

"If you have a computer with a slower CPU, you should probably avoid this option. This is especially true on slow laptops and tablets. That’s unfortunate because a cheap Windows notebook or tablet will often have a small amount of storage, making this option tempting. But that slower CPU means enabling compression will tax your system and slow things down."

http://www.howtogeek.com/266472/should-you-use-windows-full-drive-compression-to-save-space/

Proof? I've never heard of anything like this, where the simple act of putting something as complex as a video game onto an SD card format instead of a Blu-ray disc magically cuts its file size in half. Sounds completely absurd, but I won't dispute something I don't fully understand.

Right. That's what I thought. Completely absurd.