By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Frogger on 17 December 2016
Edit Thread
oniyide said:
spemanig said:

The Switch will definitely have the inferior version in terms of specs. No one is arguing otherwise.

But it will have the superior version in terms of convenience, and that does have selling power. Who's to say that some of their friends won't buy the Switch version. If their friends buy the Switch too, there's no reason yet to believe that they "def" wouldn't buy the Switch version.

whats convinent of having a game like COD on the go? You wouldnt be able to play it online while moving around so there goes the main reason why people would even play that game. So they might as well just get the version for whatever system they already have and play it at home, especially if the Switch version will be worse even if played at home.

First of all, it's not just on the go. I've already said that. It's CoD untethered to your TV. And second of all, of course you can play Cod online on the go. You do it via 4G, which the patents say the Switch allows for and which Iwata specifically spoke about implementing nearly half a decade ago. Something mobile has been doing for years. That answers exactly what's convenient about CoD on the go.

So now we're back to how there is no reason to believe people "definitely" wouldn't buy the Switch version.