By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Last Guardian Review Thread - Meta: 84

Oneeee-Chan!!! said:

I didn't know that you like anime(kill la kill).

.



Around the Network

Currently sitting at 78 on opencritic. I don't think they've posted as many reviews as metacritic though. Either that or metacritic is seriously weighting several reviews. A score of 78 isn't enough to scare me away from a game. Especially something like this that I've been waiting years to play.



BAM, I nailed that sucker, i felt the 83 at the base of my...heart. It's getting great reviews though, it's a bummer to hear about the clunky controls but i'll still play it, I love me some emotions.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

I don't think under 85 score would be fair to a Fumito Ueda game, but expectations were high... I'm eager to try it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

God damn, I'm in such a dilemma.
I just bought Until Dawn, R&C, FFXV($60), and MGSV. I really want to buy The Last Guardian but....I've spent so much money lol. I feel like I could have waited on FFXV since it's not as story based as previous games.



"There is only one race, the pathetic begging race"

Around the Network

All the complaints I've seen I fully expected from an Ueda game. Cannot wait to play it and see it equal to its predecessors.



That's quite a decent meta given the niche nature of this title and the expectations that comes with 10 years of waiting.



Torillian said:
Azzanation said:

Hmm i guessed a 77, and theres still more reviews on its way. Hasnt recieved its troll reviews yet. I am sure a 2 or a 4 is on its way. 

Also you might want to look at Gregs twitter

https://twitter.com/GameOverGreggy

Just so we're all on the same page as far as math goes.  The score is 83 with 55 reviews, for it to get down to 77 the next six reviews would have to all be 2/10.  The likelihood of that is exceedingly low.  Your prediction is fucked.  

Good to see Moderators use good language.

So far as the reviews go, I honestly don’t care what it sits on. The game could sit on a 98/100 Meta I still wouldn’t buy it the way it’s made. I don’t play games with bad controls and gameplay treated as a 2nd priority. If you’re into these roller coaster type games that you might only play once than that’s good, it’s your style.

My 77 Meta guess was higher than many others who also guessed so attacking my guess is a little unfair when others guessed less. I consider my guess fair. I can see at least 1 troll review coming for this game, it’s only a matter of time. I said UC4 would get a troll review, and everybody just brushed it off as it wouldn’t happen, and guess what happened.. Someone gave it a 4/10. So I don’t have to be right on all my guesses, however I have been right many times before. Troll reviews happen on all the popular games. It will be very lucky not to score below 5. However it’s just another guess not me stating a fact.

If gamers are happy to except an 83 Meta than I’ll be looking forward to reading what gamers say when the next Xbox or Nintendo title hit the same mark.

If you like my post or not. If doesn’t bother me one bit. I am just committing to open threads like these.



Sounds like it is a solid game. Bit disappointing that after 10 years neither this game or FFXV are going to be labelled extraordinary or brilliant.

Still, I am 20 hours in to FFXV and having a good time.

Will pick this up after a few price drops, and hopefully some patches to deal with the frame rate.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Azzanation said:
Torillian said:

Just so we're all on the same page as far as math goes.  The score is 83 with 55 reviews, for it to get down to 77 the next six reviews would have to all be 2/10.  The likelihood of that is exceedingly low.  Your prediction is fucked.  

Good to see Moderators use good language.

So far as the reviews go, I honestly don’t care what it sits on. The game could sit on a 98/100 Meta I still wouldn’t buy it the way it’s made. I don’t play games with bad controls and gameplay treated as a 2nd priority. If you’re into these roller coaster type games that you might only play once than that’s good, it’s your style.

My 77 Meta guess was higher than many others who also guessed so attacking my guess is a little unfair when others guessed less. I consider my guess fair. I can see at least 1 troll review coming for this game, it’s only a matter of time. I said UC4 would get a troll review, and everybody just brushed it off as it wouldn’t happen, and guess what happened.. Someone gave it a 4/10. So I don’t have to be right on all my guesses, however I have been right many times before. Troll reviews happen on all the popular games. It will be very lucky not to score below 5. However it’s just another guess not me stating a fact.

If gamers are happy to except an 83 Meta than I’ll be looking forward to reading what gamers say when the next Xbox or Nintendo title hit the same mark.

If you like my post or not. If doesn’t bother me one bit. I am just committing to open threads like these.

Don't really care about your feelings on the game, just letting you know that math means that a 20 or 40 review is not going to be enough to get to 77 as you made it seem in the original post I quoted.  Everything beyond that is just...like....your opinion, man.  

Do you disagree that your prediction is fucked?  Or would it be nicer to say that your prediction appears mathematically to be incredibly unlikely and is therefore fucked?  



...