83 (60 reviews)
starcraft said: Sounds like it is a solid game. Bit disappointing that after 10 years neither this game or FFXV are going to be labelled extraordinary or brilliant. Still, I am 20 hours in to FFXV and having a good time. Will pick this up after a few price drops, and hopefully some patches to deal with the frame rate. |
A lot of VsXIII was scrapped when it changed gears to XV, so it's more like 6 years.
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!
Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames
Torillian said:
Don't really care about your feelings on the game, just letting you know that math means that a 20 or 40 review is not going to be enough to get to 77 as you made it seem in the original post I quoted. Everything beyond that is just...like....your opinion, man. Do you disagree that your prediction is fucked? Or would it be nicer to say that your prediction appears mathematically to be incredibly unlikely and is therefore fucked? |
No, his prediction is fucked, but he knew it was fucked from the start because he only made such a low prediction to get a rise out of PlayStation fans.
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!
Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames
That's higher then i expected really.
In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.
starcraft said: Sounds like it is a solid game. Bit disappointing that after 10 years neither this game or FFXV are going to be labelled extraordinary or brilliant. |
Oh, TLG certainly will be. Much more so than any other game this year.
Roronaa_chan said:
Oh, TLG certainly will be. Much more so than any other game this year. |
The big complains are about framerate, controls not that the game is not special or good soo yea.
Cant wait for Tonight
heard from reviewers that this game has lot of artificial time wasteing elements in it and the puzzle parts are really basic and routinei. Is that true?
Torillian said:
Don't really care about your feelings on the game, just letting you know that math means that a 20 or 40 review is not going to be enough to get to 77 as you made it seem in the original post I quoted. Everything beyond that is just...like....your opinion, man. Do you disagree that your prediction is fucked? Or would it be nicer to say that your prediction appears mathematically to be incredibly unlikely and is therefore fucked? |
if his prediction is fucked, i wonder what happened to mine
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=183338&page=1
bananaking21 said:
if his prediction is fucked, i wonder what happened to mine
|
I would say there are good reasons to think your prediction and his would have different validity
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."