By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Hillary Clinton won. How much time till Nuclear War?

Tagged games:

 

Hillary Clinton won. How much time till Nuclear War?

There will be no nuclear ... 168 47.19%
 
Nuclear World war in 2017... 64 17.98%
 
Nuclear Armaggedom in 2018. 15 4.21%
 
We will be living like Fallout 4 in 2019. 55 15.45%
 
Nuclear war before her term ends. 54 15.17%
 
Total:356
Netyaroze said:
WagnerPaiva said:

It is funny then that CNN did not bother to correct it, neither USA defense people. Cause it seems such a false claim from Russia would be kind of a big deal.

Well its more sensationalist gives more clicks views etc. Ofcourse they would not dispute the claim. USA defense people want americans to fear russia for job security.

Does not matter really, 100 nukes going off anywhere would kill all mankind with fallout and contamination.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Around the Network
CosmicSex said:
I haven't heard anyone explain why Trump would make a good president. Only why Hilary needs to be hated. And I'm not a fan of hating people just because I was told too. This applies to Trump as well. When I look at him, I don't hate him. For Trump supports, what does he do to increase the quality of your life as president? Please be clear. For example:
If Hilary becomes president, she has committed herself to making community colleges free. That would help a lot of people get the education they need to create and work and support themselves.

Notice how I didn't bring up hate for her opponent? What is it about Trump that attracts you to him and has caused him to earn your vote?

HA. You used logic, you fell right into their trap.(yu-gi would be super pround of them)

Expect unfounded claims, "theories", and insults as a reply. That's how most "arguments" work when it comes to politics.



naruball said:
CosmicSex said:
I haven't heard anyone explain why Trump would make a good president. Only why Hilary needs to be hated. And I'm not a fan of hating people just because I was told too. This applies to Trump as well. When I look at him, I don't hate him. For Trump supports, what does he do to increase the quality of your life as president? Please be clear. For example:
If Hilary becomes president, she has committed herself to making community colleges free. That would help a lot of people get the education they need to create and work and support themselves.

Notice how I didn't bring up hate for her opponent? What is it about Trump that attracts you to him and has caused him to earn your vote?

HA. You used logic, you fell right into their trap.(yu-gi would be super pround of them)

Expect unfounded claims, "theories", and insults as a reply. That's how most "arguments" work when it comes to politics.

I disagree. We all know he will be a shitty president, but with him at least we prevent war with Russia. Just get out of Syria and leave Bashar Al Saad lose the petrodollar if he wants, that alone is enough to calm China and Russia. Stop the globalist nonsense, that is all that matters.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Faelco said:
KungKras said:

Tsar Bomba has a blast radius of about the size of Paris.

Orders of magnitude smaller than half of France.

 

Yeah, I remembered it wrong. The blast radius is about the size of Paris but a lot more people would be affected by the bomb. It's more like 1/4 of the french population would be directly affected by the bomb.

Also, the ten nukes that spread and reach far targets Satan 2 delivers would cause such a devastation as Tzar would never be able to. Destroying the power grid and water distribution alone is enough to anihilate 10-20% of the population of a rich country. Remember how people went insane in Katrina Hurricane. Imagine a beyond repair damage to the eletrical and water grids. Most people would go insane in 3 or 4 days.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

WagnerPaiva said:
Faelco said:

 

Yeah, I remembered it wrong. The blast radius is about the size of Paris but a lot more people would be affected by the bomb. It's more like 1/4 of the french population would be directly affected by the bomb.

Also, the ten nukes that spread and reach far targets Satan 2 delivers would cause such a devastation as Tzar would never be able to. Destroying the power grid and water distribution alone is enough to anihilate 10-20% of the population of a rich country. Remember how people went insane in Katrina Hurricane. Imagine a beyond repair damage to the eletrical and water grids. Most people would go insane in 3 or 4 days.

It would also be the end of Russia. There's a reason why it didn't happen in the 60s and won't happen now, hate to break it to you, but you likely are going to die a boring death in an old folks home, not some nuclear holocaust out of the Terminator movies and even in the Terminator movies it's artificial intelligence A.I. that kills most of humanity not because US/Russia started a war with each other. 



Around the Network
WagnerPaiva said:
AsGryffynn said:

Sarmat isn't online and neither Prompt GS, so no, the nukes packing this kind of power are still undergoing trials... 

The point of the thread was not Satan 2, both USA and Russia are Trident ready nations, meaning they can destroy everything everywhere in a few hours. The Satan 2 missile sure sounds impressive, but Russia and the US are caplable of total mutual destruction since the 80s.

The point is, how long will Hillary be able to pressure Russia till war begins. And, if she suceeds in killing Bashar, how long till China and Russia nuke the crap out of everything?

If she takes Bassad out directly? Give him a few hours to move everyone into Russia-2, see him target Russia with an small nuke before sealing his gates and then Dead Hand will take care of the rest (since DH only starts whenever a nuke strikes Russia, Putin will be able to claim they started it). 

Otherwise, crooked Hillary will simply use bold characters whenever she writes strongly worded letters... 



Hillary is not going to make Colleges free...


Its typical progressive talk to get votes and ran a status quo Neo Liberal government...

I am only 18 and some of you said as naive as my friends...



WagnerPaiva said:
Netyaroze said:

Well its more sensationalist gives more clicks views etc. Ofcourse they would not dispute the claim. USA defense people want americans to fear russia for job security.

Does not matter really, 100 nukes going off anywhere would kill all mankind with fallout and contamination.

It really depends on the nuclear bomb.

Actually 100 Hiroshima Bombs would not do that much. 

The strenght of the bombs is measured in kilo/mega tons its the equivalent of tons of TNT.

The Hiroshima Bomb had 20 Kilotons which is equivalent to 20000 kgTNT exploding.

100 times that would be 2 Megatons. Which is 2 Million kg TNT.

Tsar Bomba had 50 Megtons which is 50 Million Tons of TNT. 

A single Tsar Bomba is as strong as 2500 Hiroshima bombs. 

The impact that wiped out the dinosaurs. Was like 2 Million Tsar Bombas or 240000 GigaTons of TNT. We have 15000 atomic bombs currently. All far weaker then Tsar. 

The second most energetic eruption after that impact was a supervulcano which was 5000 times stronger than Tsar. To impact all the earth severly and alot of people it is enough to fire 15000 Bombs. But to extinct the human race everywhere on the planet we need much much more power. 

Ofcourse there would be nuclear winter and Billions dead however in the history of earth there were way more energetic events than the combined energy of all nuclear weapons in existance which brought way more dust in to the atmosphere and fauna and flora survived.  

The Fallout is also survivable, ofcourse life expectancy would go back to like 25 in heavily contaminated areas.

The USA fired 1200 Nuclear Bombs for test purposes in the past 50 years which is a third of all fired bombs in the past fifty years and most people ahve no clue ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_the_United_States )

100 bombs evenly fired would impact all of as a bit and kill many millions. Maybe temperatures would drop enough to cancel the increasing of temperatures in the past decades. 

The earth is a huge place and asteroids, meteors can unload all the bombs we ever produced in milliseconds on us and we would still survive.  The dinausaur impactor was 10 kilometers in diameter thats bigger than the everest. We would barely be able to blow up everest with every single nuclear bomb we have.

We would have to drill into everest and place the bombs there. 



WagnerPaiva said:
Fei-Hung said:
Does this mean iwont get to play my backers copy of Shenmue 3?!

Is that a thing? By SEGA? Cool, I hope they port it to PS4.

 

It was a big thi g during the E3 of dreams. they dropped this bombshell at Sony's E3 shortly after announcing FF7R. 

 

They announced a Kickstarter which broke the record of raising money for a game. $60 woukd guarantee your physical copy of Shenmue 3 on PC with a limited edition hardcase. 



Soundwave said:
WagnerPaiva said:

Also, the ten nukes that spread and reach far targets Satan 2 delivers would cause such a devastation as Tzar would never be able to. Destroying the power grid and water distribution alone is enough to anihilate 10-20% of the population of a rich country. Remember how people went insane in Katrina Hurricane. Imagine a beyond repair damage to the eletrical and water grids. Most people would go insane in 3 or 4 days.

It would also be the end of Russia. There's a reason why it didn't happen in the 60s and won't happen now, hate to break it to you, but you likely are going to die a boring death in an old folks home, not some nuclear holocaust out of the Terminator movies and even in the Terminator movies it's artificial intelligence A.I. that kills most of humanity not because US/Russia started a war with each other. 

Of all mankind. IT would be the end of all mankind. At elast as we know it. Granted, some people would survive in a nightmarish unspeakable horrorific world, but as we know it mankind would be done.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.