Well its a great thing we didn't occupy, because things are great now. I get what you're saying though, but its evident things aren't gonna get better there until the threat is annihilated and Obama did not encrouage that. But I hope people have learned you can't just ignore evil.

Well illegal Mexicans do make up a vast majority of crime commited by illegal aliens. Mexico is our neighbor and its clearly a country with a lot of problems. Nobody is suggesting a wall for Canada for obvious reasons. People will interpret the Trump Mexicans speech to what fits the narrative they want. Democrats want us all to believe it was a racist speech, but the real intent of that speech was to be tougher on criminal illegals which are mostly from Mexico. Had he said it differently there wouldn't be a discussion, it was the biggest blunder Trump has made in his campaign.

People say Bush lied, but wasn't there a lot of intelligence saying Iraq had WMDs? Either way, I'm of a small minority that seems to think the world is better with Saddam dead. I just wish more was done to bring sanity to the middle east, because ignoring it and hoping things get better was never an option.

It's not really 176 reasons, it's 2 reasons, "he is insulting" and "he is lying", with 176 "evidences". So the title is quite a bit stretched.

It's not put in perspective, while we know that Trump supporters vote a lot against Clinton. Can you really think about that, don't shrug it off, don't spin it :
- what ever lie and bold statement Trump had, he had it just as a public personality, and he knew he would get media attention worth million dollars from any bold statement. It's fair to say he would not be even there without that, and that part is a tactical use of sensationalist journalism. It's fair enough also to say he has a big ego and present himself as prescient.
- what ever lie and bold statement Clinton had, she had it as a public servant, she is accountable for it, especially because a lot of her lies (or supposedly lies) are here to cover her dishonnesty (corruption) as a public servant.

In these "evidences", we can see different patterns we have to break down.

- Trump is falsely presented as the problem when he is not the major concern
Trump can call to hack Clinton's server, but it's just words. He does not have an army of obedient hackers waiting his order, right ? Hackers will hack anyway. So that's not big deal, it's just tactical. The real problem here is Clinton, she lied about her private server, she put national security at risk with her private server, and she did not comply to congress requests. That's so much worst, it's not even comparable.
Trump can lie about his position regarding Irak, and that's something I don't like, but it's not the same as actually voting for the war in Irak. As a business man, he did not have access to reports, does not have specifically thought about the question.

- Bold statements are presented as something horrible
That can be too much, but again that's part a communication style, part about getting attention, and part an hyperbole. I mean telling illegal mexican immigrants are bringing drug and crime, he does not mean every single of them, the point here is that there is that there is a security issue with illegal immigration, a complete failure regarding immigration law reinforcement, and that he's positionning himslef as someone that acknoweldge the problem, and as someone that is willing to fix it. Also it has to compared to Clinton that does not even think about it as a problem. There is a major drug and crime problem inside Mexico, that's plain fact, how the hell would uncontrolled, illegal immigration does not bring drugs and crimes ?

- His lies to make up thing or make himself look smart
That's a fact and I don't think it's a good thing, but it's not as much damaging as lying unde oath in front of the congress regarding security. Also it does not make him less smart or able, he is successful, his economic plan makes sense to me, and he is not tied by foreign and wall street money. The ability to do is the point, and it does not minor it so much. Clinton on the other hand is the very reason why nothing changes : corruption.

If you want stability in the Middle East so bad, why don't you go over there and fight for it? Sign up for the Marines, they're always looking for fresh recruits. It's easy to say to other people they should risk their lives to go fight in a country which in reality doesn't have much to do with America. 

The "ISIS inspired" attacks in the US killed 16 people in San Bernandino and 49 in that Florida nightclub (which I still suspect was also motivated by a guy who was basically gay himself, what shooter "scopes" out a gay nightclub ... for several years, the drink specials were that good?).

More people have died in "regular" school shootings in the US. 

Since 9/11 there's likely been more people killed in America by bee stings per year on average than a terrorist attack. Should we declare war on the bees too?

Mexican immigrants commit less crime than the average American actually as well:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-mythical-connection-between-immigrants-and-crime-1436916798

Trump is pandering to a racist section of the right wing by pushing this narrative. If you want to be a "criminal", it's far easier to do so in Mexico, why the fuck would you come to America for that? It's a lot easier to live that life style and you can bribe your way out jail time there, you'd have to be a dumb ass to do that in the US where people get life in prison for smoking a joint three times. Most Mexicans coming here are people who just want a better life for their kids and willing to work cleaning up shit stained toilet bowls and puke stained bed sheets and picking fruit in blazing heat for 60 hours a week for pennies on the dollar. 

Okay, maybe I will go. I got some free time. Bottom line, the world doesn't get better when we just sit around. You can't ignore evil and that's why we drop bombs and send in the drones, but it evidently doesn't solve the problem entirely.

I don't think you got all the ISIS inspired killings... but the ones you mentioned are a good start. Perhaps the attacks in Europe are worth a mention as well. Fortunately we do stop some before they can attack as well. Frankly, its a problem you fight before it gets worse.

I can post links too! http://www.cbsnews.com/news/undocumented-immigrants-increasingly-filling-arizona-prisons/

Why come to America to be a criminal? Too much competition in Mexico? Even the police will rob you in Mexico and that's not a joke.

I live in Arizona and I totally see the value of Mexican's in this country, but we can let in what we need legally. US citizens pay the taxes and our safety should be the priority, so at the very least we should track who is here illegally for our safety and deal with the criminals. Simply doing that would make people more comfortable with our illegal population.

Well, if this is true I guess you will not be supporting the candidate who will make sure that illegals never, ever, ever allow themselves to get tracked for fear of summary deportation? 

You are showing reason for not voting for Trump. Implicitely, you are telling people should vote for someone else than Trump... But we should not compare, and not even talk about Clinton ? It's about as dishonnest as it can be.

You keep loving Reagan but was the economy that great in the 80s?  I don't know as much considering I was just growing up then.  I do know the 90s were pretty decent economic times but still not best.  I know for fact Reagan started driving up debt during the 80s.  His plan was cut taxes for rich brackets mainly and increase military spending to outspend Russia in the Cold War.

"When charted in dollars, in Chart 4.01, the total accumulation of federal debt looks huge. Looking back over the last century, the debt back in 1900 doesn’t really register. But by charting accumulated debt as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in Chart 4.02, you get a look at government debt compared to the size of the economy at the time."

" Starting at 45 percent of GDP in 1941 federal debt zoomed, reaching almost 119 percent of GDP in 1946 after the end of the war, with state and local debt adding another 7 percent. For the next 35 years successive governments brought down the debt, but then came President Reagan. He increased the federal debt up to 50 percent of GDP to win the Cold War. President Bush increased the debt to fight a war on terror and bail out the banks. President Obama increased the debt to fund a plan to revive the economy in the aftermath of the Crash of 2008, peaking at 120.6 percent of GDP, federal, state and local in 2014. Debt is expected to decline as percent of GDP in the near future."

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/debt_deficit_history

You keep touting Reagan like his Voodoo economics was a miracle for the US economy.  I'm just not seeing it.  You can't cut taxes along with social programs but then pump up the defense budget.  Driving up the military budget won't offset the cuts in social programs.  Basically, Republicans want to increase the size of government military wise but slash social programs that many Americans rely on.  Doesn't seem right in my book.  They also say oh there is so much fraud in welfare, food stamps, etc... Sure there is but you know what I believe the US military has way more fraud.  If you want to save some money don't increase the military budget.  Give it a full audit and get rid of all the bullshit waste projects that we have or have done with private contractors wasting untold billions.

 Obviously that is an oversimplification, if only angry white males would elect Trump he would've already lost. As the race is pretty tight currently (although with a small advantage for Clinton), there must be some others who are willing to vote for Trump.

As an european I pretty much don't care which of the two will bring WWIII. Although I could beg the Americans to vote for Jill Stein.

Well, China will be the next global leader either way. OK, some nuclear bombs on major chinese cities may change that outcome, but it may change the future of the whole worlds in unforseeable ways.