I just gave you the explanation you asked for. Why are you asking the same questions again?

Ubisoft on NX: “what we have seen is really great”

Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot again commented on NX during the publisher’s financial conference call a short while ago.

Guillemot started out by mentioning what Ubisoft has seen thus far “is really great”. He also believes that the system can “take lots more casual players back in the industry.”

Guillemot’s words in full:

“On the NX, what we have seen is really great, so we think having a new machine coming is going to help the industry to continue to grow and to take lots more casual players back in the industry.”

Ubisoft has confirmed one game for NX thus far, that being Just Dance 2017. It remains to be seen what other plans the company has up its sleeves.

http://nintendoeverything.com/ubisoft-on-nx-what-we-have-seen-is-really-great/

There's casual games, and then there are low quality games. Nintendo makes high-quality casual games most of the time.

Ubisoft always makes low quality casual games.

Well no third party really consistently makes games as good as Nintendo, doesn't mean Ubi Soft released just crap. Zombi U, Rayman Legends, even Assassin's Creed III/IV were good to great games. If you like casual gaming, then I don't see how Just Dance is worse than Wii Music or Wii Party something.  

It's not like Wii Sports or Wii Fit or Wii Party or Mario & Sonic Olympics are winning any awards for the best quality games Nintendo has ever made, so you can't then get upset that third parties make casual mini-game collections too ... that's something central to the entire idea of a casual console (simplistic, short burst gaming). 

If the system is tailored towards non-conventional styles of games like fitness games, educational games, mini-game partythons, you can't kinda have it both ways and say "well Nintendo should make a console specifically tailored for this audience", but then not want third parties to make games for that same audience. It would be advertising a pool party, but getting upset when people show up with swim trunks and bikinis. 

Consistently good? Mario Party 10, Animal Crossing Amiibo and many more games recently from Nintendo have been far from good. Zombi U isn't a good game either, Watch Dogs is better than that game.

Uhhhh... Splatoon, Super Mario Maker, Xenoblade Chronicles X, Yoshi's Woolly World and another bunch of 3DS games were all good titles that Nintendo released in 2015. 

So you want Nintendo to make a casual platform to the point of decrying things like dual analog, but you don't want third parties to make casual games for it. I dunno if I follow the logic.

I don't even recall Ubi Soft ever "shitting on Nintendo", they've supported them a fair deal, everyone including Nintendo bailed on the Wii U, can't really fault them for that, but even there they probably supported the system better than most. 

When people like Rol and I say we want a mass market console we don't mean we want shitty games. Wii Sports Resort, Mario Kart Wii and Mario Bros. Wii were high quality games and still attracted a casual audience, just like Tetris, Mario Land, etc. (heck, the original Pokemon was a casual game unless millions of 6-10 year olds count as hardcore gamers now). This picture illustrates the point: 

What we want is the dog. What Ubisoft makes is the play-thingy on the right side. That's what is upsetting him. Unfortunately casual gaming has become so synonymous on gaming forums with "low quality games" that people often think we want that as well.